Jump to content
SAU Community

33vspec

Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    100%

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    brisbane

Profile Fields

  • Car(s)
    r33 gtr vspec

33vspec's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I just simply ran the image where the car looks normal (in GTR32's post) through jpegsnoop. You shouldnt have even needed the original file that is posted above, although it just clarifies. The answer was right infront of you all the whole time.... It states uncertain if the image is processed. Some times one of you (thats all it would take) should look outside of the square, in this case - something as simple as examining the other image in depth would have saved you all alot of time and effort. In the future, i recommend instead of placing so much focus on the images which you believe are the fakes, check out the ones which you believe are 'authentic' and more importantly - dont overlook their output. A good photoshop job is one where you cant tell any manipulation has been performed, and if the artist is really good - they'll know how to manipulate the EXIF and IPTC too
  2. BMP files wont work with JPEGsnoop matey. But your correct, that is the earliest copy of the same image, so you can let KR4-GTR off the hook here as this proves he's definately not responsible for the editing. JPEG exif and IPTC (the data which jpegsnoop reads) are manipulated very easily. You shouldnt rely solemnly on a freeware program such as jpegsnoop to determine the authenticity of an image (as clearly demonstrated in this thread) as there are also other factors to take into account. I've run the image that KR4 posted and the output demonstrates that it was edited. The edit steps were around quality being changed from '12' down to '9' and conversion to JPEG. The hue etc should be disregarded as its nothing but the slight standard adjustments which occur when you resave an image with less quality. Any other edits in question were not made at the same point that the quality / file format was changed. I've assessed the other image where the car looks normal with some of my programs from work and it comes back as uncertain if processed or edited, i was under the impression that jpegsnoop would also pick this up. I'll look into this further but if this is the case, it looks like someone's probably played with the EXIF's. You shouldnt rely on jpegsnoop because you can easily edit or clear EXIF and IPTC data from any jpeg imagee with a large number of programs. Just google it and will find lots of them to either customise or even return the data to a stock generic template for example olympus or canon cameras (which is the easiest way to do it). I know this because I edit them when I shop my pictures and add copyrights - etc. I've found with some images if you do edit this data or use one of the common templates - it will make it a 'class 4 file' which means it is uncertain if processed or original. If this is the case then this should explain this other picture where the car looks normal. As night falls, its a goose chase, you cant determine from the image who edited it, but the date stamp of that file above makes me believe its the seller, as the main creation and edits made to the original BMP file were made on 04 December 2009. way before any of this conversation begun.
  3. Hey mate, just wondering if you could tell me where you got the Carbon fibre dash and window switch panels for your GTR? Cheers
  4. RHD only seem to have the R34 vspec stickers, looking for an R33 orginal, slightly different. Cheers
  5. Does anyone know where to find a replacement Vspec sticker for an R33 GTR? Mine has peeled off in parts.
  6. damn, rhd dont seem to sell them anymore either. thanks anyway
  7. hey mate, sorry havent check this thread in a while, is it still in a holding pattern? If so can you pm me with the price and how much did you want for the deposit? Can do it straight away Cheers
  8. ALL REASONABLE OFFERS CONSIDERED RETAILS FOR $2395 White face NISMO 320km/h - 11,000rpm Dash Cluster and white face sub meter gauges for R33 GTR. Odometer starts at 0km, perfect for rebuild. THEY HAVE TO GO, MAKE US AN OFFER
  9. For Sale $1650 White face NISMO 320km/h - 11,000rpm Dash Cluster and white face sub meter gauges for R33 GTR. Odometer starts at 0km, perfect for rebuild. Bought to put in my GTR but no longer going ahead with project. Retails for $2395 Attached thumbnail(s) Reduced 77% 640 x 480 (211.74K)// Reduced 77% 640 x 480 (310.55K)// Reduced 77% 640 x 480 (272.92K)// Reduced 77% 640 x 480 (271.08K)
  10. For Sale $1650 White face NISMO 320km/h - 11,000rpm Dash Cluster and white face sub meter gauges for R33 GTR. Odometer starts at 0km, perfect for rebuild. Bought to put in my GTR but no longer going ahead with project. Retails for $2395
  11. Hi, yeah the intake plenum fits R34 GTR and all other GTRs. I would consider making a deal for both the intake plenum and the oil pump. Cheers
  12. Is the pen size one, silver, with the rocker switch - just called apexi auto timer
×
×
  • Create New...