Jump to content
SAU Community

Power Fc Air Conditioning


edizio
 Share

Recommended Posts

Voltage to the ECU seems to be fine and I've connected the multimeter to the negative terminal and my earthing points on top of the rocker cover. Seems like the resistance is ok. I didn't expect there to be grounding issues as the wiring is very neat and tidy.

I may have found the problem though; turning the screw on the AAC isn't actually doing anything other than making idle leaner. I was expecting that turning it counter clockwise would cause the idle rpm to rise but it's not doing that at all. I would assume that this would affect both idle and the air con system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take a picture of that and post it if that can help confirm? It's definitely going lean if I turn the screw anti-clockwise and not increasing the idle speed but there doesn't seem to be any additional piping down there.

There's no vacuum leaks in the system either though as I had a smoke test run which held pressure very well indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

Sorry for the delay in replying, I've actually been off on business and had to drop the car back in the garage. I've ordered the AAC gasket so I'm going to take that off and give it a good clean when I'm back but it won't be for a good week or so. I have a feeling that my AC issues/dodgy idle when cold is probably down to something around here as the electrics seem fine.

I wonder if someone could clarify for me though: -

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v150/tegguy/002.jpg

Is this the IACV? I thought that this was the cold air control valve - can this be taken apart and cleaned easily?

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc252/kagekispirit/TechNical%20Support/Rb26AACvalve.jpg

This is the AAC and the part I just bought the gasket for and is the component that has the screw on it. I'm going to take this off and clean with carb cleaner until it shines! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First photo is called the Air Regulator by Nissan.

It's simply a cold start/fast idle 12V bi-metallic strip valve which allows idle air to by-pass the throttle plate and flow directly to the plenum, thus increasing idle speed.

Engine bay heat will eventually close the valve irrespective of the 12V supply.

It's one bit of gear I always block on my Rb's as I find the AAC can do everything I need.

If you trace your idle air pipe work, you'll find a tee where the idle circuit splits with one circuit running to the AAC and the other circuit running under the plenum to the Air Reg. (brown plug)

Your car also has the idle bump up activated by the aircon.

A simple solenoid valve by-passing the AAC and allowing idle air directly to the plenum, thus increasing idle speed. (The solenoid with the purple plug)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that! So I am going to be cleaning both of those and checking the pipe work for problems. I'll also do an idle re-learn on the power fc.

As far as unplugging the purple wire, I felt a little uneasy about that as I couldn't see why cutting out the air regulator would be a good idea. I can't see why nissan would put a part in whose problem can be solved by unplugging it lol. I guess I will have a go, I'm just not overly confident that I know what I'm doing so I don't want to be driving the car around with wires unplugged.

Regarding the screw on the second image, I.e. The one I thought was the AAC, which has the AAC sticker on it, is it the TPS wire that I need to disconnect? I've read so many posts that say that it's the brown plug, some people saying the TPS etc, is there a definite answer for this on the rb26? I expected that if i turn the screw the idle speed will change, but when I was doing this, I had disconnected nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bad. For some reason I thought you had an R33/Rb25.

Rb26 doesn't have the purple plug solenoid for the aircon idle bump up.

It does have an AAC and an Air Reg, but you'd have to be pretty keen to find them, they're well buried under the plenum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see, well I can get at them, I've got the tools to take them off and I'm hoping that cleaning it out may help the air con problem and the idle issues.

Do you know if it is the brown plug or the TPS that needs disconnecting to adjust the idle rpm screw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. Any decent third party diagnostics unit should be able to talk Consult and all the other non-OBD protocols from back in the day. It's only 25 years since OBD started taking over. There's many cars from that ear still on the road. My mechanic's diag terminal is plenty able to talk to the other CUs in my car. Well, those that are still present, anyway. That's probably only the HICAS CU, as there never was an ABS or TCS or SRS CU, and the TCU went in the bin 25 years ago.
    • You'd be better off putting the ATTESA stuff into the boot. Same same but different, and not as bulky as a fuel cell. The space under the parcel shelf is not what I'd call "useful" boot space most of the time, even if I seem to have a guitar (not mine - child's) sitting there most days lately.
    • The main argument for lighter ARBs is that ARBs reduce the independence of the suspension. They link the left wheel to the right wheel. The lighter the ARB is, the less this linkage. When you hit a significant one wheel bump on a car with lighter springs and heavier ARBs, more of that disturbance gets transferred across to the other wheel. Whereas, with a heavier spring and lighter ARB, the impacted wheel is the only one that reacts to the hit. If you hit a significant two wheel bump, then lighter springs are the only things taking the bump as the ARB is not involved (both ends move up/down together). Then the spring rates alone determine how the car takes the hit. Softer springs (to a degree) will be more comfortable. Harder springs will accept the energy input better with less total compression (but obviously possibly more undesirable and probably uncomfortable body movement). The other significant thing to remember is that spring rate is really about coping with the rate at which loads are input to the suspension. Driving around slowly? Then any bump you hit is going to feed load into the suspension at a low rate, and you can use a low rate spring and with a low rate spring the damper has to less work to control the spring's motion. This describes street usage because it is mostly illegal to go fast or drive aggressively enough to require handling fast load inputs. But if you're going at racetrack speeds (or rally, or anything where going fast over whatever the surface is) then the loads get applied faster and you need to control that input with more spring rate, and then the dampers have to do more and that's why it all starts getting expensive. Anyway, the point of all that is, it's complicated, depends on usage and surface quality, and it's why proper race cars have a lot of adjustment and will even completely swap out springs and dampers when going from one track to another. One track might be smooth, and so even if it is a fast track there won't be rapid load input. Another track might be as rough as guts, or it might have a couple of sets of tight esses on it that require the car to heave from side to side. The rates at which loads get fed in will be different on those two tracks and probably require completely different setup. Three paragraphs and 400 words are nowhere near enough to convey how complicated this subject is and also I am nowhere near the right person to write a treatise on it, as it it not my field of expertise, or even keen interest. There are many books written on the topic, and as alluded to previously, they take differing approaches to accepting the compromises involved. So you can't read just one and think you understand.
    • Personally, i'd be dropping the extra $400 for the Pro series. I believe (at least during their original conception) they were based off the Blue series but have evolved with apparent new valving tech etc etc.  The BC's were super harsh ride wise, felt like the road was covered in potholes almost (this with damping at softest), but they did feel a bit more pointy initially through corners, i felt like there was considerably more understeer at turn in on tighter radius corners (but this is not really a like or like, considering the difference in wheel size, tyre choice, track temp etc etc) 
    • Facts but it's okay I've ordered a new ignitor based on GTSBoy's confidence. In the meantime I did the ole jiggle tap on the maf connector with no change. Seems like the warmer it gets outside the worse the issues get. Hoping it's the ignitor. Also going to pick up some carb cleaner and try to get that iacv cleaned out real good. I'll report back once I've gathered more data. I really appreciate the feedback though guys keep it coming. Trying to learn everything I can about this car want to keep this thing for a long time.
×
×
  • Create New...