Jump to content
SAU Community

dave1200

Members
  • Posts

    192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Profile Fields

  • Real Name
    Awesome

dave1200's Achievements

Collaborator

Collaborator (7/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

12

Reputation

  1. If it's a neo head you'll know if you've bent valves or not by just putting some feelers between cam and lifter. Standard gaps are something in the 0.010" range, if you've bent a valve you'll find a lot more than that gap. PS - I don't like your chances..... Dave
  2. I was bored yesterday so uploaded the time lapse videos I took while building my motor - Reasonably boring stuff but for anybody who's interested have a look. Dave
  3. I'm a DIY kind of guy. You get incredible functionality for a good price. For less than $1000 I'll get an ECU that's entirely configurable with all the I/O of a high end ECU. As I said earlier they generate more head scratching but I've got a few mates who have had good success with megasquirt as well as know a tuner who is familiar with them.
  4. Thanks but Not sure this helps me. The problem is that the Neo NA ecu and loom are different to the turbo therefore any of the plug and play ecus won't work because nobody supports the NA motor. If I have to wire one from scratch it will be a megasquirt but I'm mostly looking at the pros and cons of replacing loom with a turbo then getting a plug and play ecu/piggyback nistune style. I think I can get a megasquirt running the complete NA motor then would just need to change injectors and go to map sensor to run a big turbo but this would have much more head scratching than the other option.
  5. I slapped a radiator and short exhaust on it this week. Sounds absolutely awesome. Very crisp and revvy. All I need now is a car to whack it in. Does anybody have any good ideas about converting it to a Programmable ecu? I'm am idiot and didn't look into this and now have the issue of doing one if these things. 1. Buy a complete turbo loom and ecu and injectors then going nisstune. 2. As above but plugging in a pfc 3. Start from scratch with a aftermarket loom and ecu. I would be thinking megasquirt if going down this path. Any advice would be welcome. Dave T
  6. Cheers for that. I've ended up going with the two tensioners. A little update, I got it running tonight. I nearly fell off my seat it was so loud running straight off the headers right next to me. I set up an oil pressure gauge in my little switch box and it's making plenty. I only ran it for a few seconds since there's no water in it yet.
  7. Can you elaborate on this? I don't understand how the tensioner hole position has any influence on the timing marks. The drive side of the timing belt is phasing the belt teeth based on the length of the path the belt follows. I reckon using an idler pulley doesn't get the crank to cam sync quite right. The other thing is that the timing marks on the head backing plate are probably only as accurate as they needed to be assuming you were putting a timing belt back on an RB25 block (ie you aren't wrong by a hole tooth). I am probably thinking about it too much and if I truly want to get it right I would need to dial the crank to the cams properly. Thanks for the help!
  8. Hey guys a bit of an update. I lost a battle with the committee and had to sell my R31. I did however decide to keep building this motor. I found a healthy R31 Rb30 and as of tonight just got the Rb25 head torqued down. I set up all the timing gear and turned up some oil restrictors before cleaning the block and giving it a coat of paint. Here's a couple of pics for anyone who's interested. I've actually set up my gopro to take time lapse photos of the build for shits and giggles which I'll whack up one day if anybody would be interested. A keen eye will spot I have used a block without the machine face where the idler pulley sits. I've made up a 5mm plate to bridge it and machine that amount off the idler to suit. Not ideal but hey we're building a budget setup. Has anybody else noticed when you use the concentric idler in the drive side of the timing gear that you timing marks don't line up perfectly? I have trialed a second tensioner in that place and can dial in the timing marks HOWEVER this makes me nervous in the case that it slips and throws the cam timing out. Thoughts?
  9. sounds like coil packs or plug gapping issue. What gap are you running?
  10. Yeah I knocked one up a couple of weeks ago. I'm going to run this hose to the 3/4" BSP fitting in the block since I'm going N/A. Then Vent this tube also up to the catch can (in the bottom also acting like a drain for catch can). I'll plumb the 2 rocker covers to the catch can also then run the catch can breather to the inlet to keep it legal.
  11. So after reading this I thought bugger it ill just Weld it up. Decided while I had the tig out I'd just Weld up the oil feed as well since there is zero chance of it ever going back on an rb25 block. I attached some average pics for anyone who may be interested. The old water gallery is a typically contaminated surface so be sure to run plenty of AC balance.
  12. I can't understand why I don't here more discussion on this forum about twin scroll setups. If you're going the GTX3076R get it with the 1.04 Twin Scroll rear housing and get a PROPER split pulse manifold with duel wastegates etc. I did this on my FJ20 and it runs a GT3071R with the 0.78 rear split pulse and manifold. Makes 21psi at 3500rpm and peak torque just after that yet pulls hard to make around 270rwkw. The engine is a midrange animal. I can only imagine on the twin cam RB30 with a relatively small turbo (GTX3076R with 1.04 split pulse) You'd probably have full boost before 3000rpm and still make 320rwkw. That to me sounds like the ideal street motor. The added benefit of the proper split pulse manifolds is the improved volumetric efficiency which may negate the need for aftermarket cams at that power level all together.
  13. nah not worried about overheating. just didn't like the look of the thin landing that's holding the water system. But that's all the encouragement I need. Cheeres
  14. Hey just a quicky - Did you bother adding material to either the head or block to get a better seal on the headgasket around water galleries? I was overlaying the 2 and there is clearly a mismatch but still some landing that would probably make a seal. I was thinking about just using a little RTV around that area since the rubbery rings in the headgasket in that area won't engage on the head. I can fairly easily add material to the head and dress it back but if you've got first hand experience of not doing it I could be talked out of the work. Dave
  15. Yep good call. Thanks for all your help by they way!
×
×
  • Create New...