Jump to content
SAU Community

Lithium

Members
  • Posts

    5,007
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by Lithium

  1. HTA GT3071R = 51.2mm HTA GT3073R = 52.6mm HTA GT3076R = 54.8mm And from results we've seen on here, 34GeeTeeTee's HTA GT3076R spools substantially better than and makes more power than a PT5558 which should put some perspective on it
  2. Welcome, man - finally
  3. Awesome - keen to hear how you find the G4+
  4. From FP themselves, but before they said they'd match price I am sure you could press them on it, I'd say the 3073 would be the equivalent
  5. They have been saying that they will match Precision prices for equivalent Precision DBB turbos on their Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/FPTurbos/posts/10151751538024473
  6. Definitely a benefit to having local support, at least for you guys haha. They are mostly cheaper, too - but FP ftw if you want the best It's handy that FP are pricing to compete with Precision at the moment, too.
  7. Lol awesome, that's hilarious Good luck for the weekend, will be interesting to see!
  8. Yeah as mentioned earlier, a bit of porting was needed as there was boost creep - wasn't rocket science, basically just grinding the metal away from the port from the outlet side until it is nearly as large as the flapper (which is big enough, nothing needs to be changed there) and maybe smoothing it out a little bit, my mate just did it himself with a die grinder. We did a bunch of comparison and the only turbo I've seen capable of the same power and spools better on an SR20 (basically all we have to compare with) was a Power Enterprise PE1420 which is rated to a fair bit less power and is really quite expensive - we had expected it to be a bit laggier than a stock T28BB but it actually spooled better!
  9. You getting one?
  10. From this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/341890-borg-warner-efr-series-turbos/page-50#entry6409057 And a later update for the same car with a stiffer spring and retune, still on pump gas - 470kw: Build thread: http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/1760881-post678.html
  11. Here's a GT3076R noise I prepared earlier:
  12. Most "real" GT3076Rs have an anti-surge housing - if it sounds like a jet spooling, its a 56-trim GT3076R with the anti-surge housing. If it doesn't, doesn't mean it's not from the range of "GT3076R" titled things... but it's much more likely to be a GT3071R.
  13. ^ starting to seem more and more like you're just saying random stuff to say that Borg Warners are over hyped with you real reasoning? You ignored the post up above about one making 630whp on pump gas, no excuses, and no need for excuses? There are plenty of awesome results out there for them - where even if there is a compromise, the numbers still shit on a typical cast GT-series equivalent for the most part.
  14. Any progress on the 500kw mission?
  15. Did you see the boost level it is running? Most RB26s aren't running nearly that, and it is twin scroll which is capable of boosting torque "per psi" versus a single entry... all works well towards making a lot of torque. In terms of spool, to be honest it did surprise me too - but it is definitely worse than GT3582Rs, particularly than twin scroll ones (keeping it apples vs apples). More things to consider - if we were to give all these turbos names to match Precision's ones (using wheel sizes) it may put into perspective how big a PT6466 is (or isn't) considering what it can make: GT3582R - GT6162R GTX3582R - GT6362R PT6466 - PT6466 T04Z - GT6765 The 66CEA turbine has by reputation less lag and more flow than the old 65mm T-series Garrett design as well, and the compressor is a light billet wheel - so really for the size they should spool at least as well as a cast wheel equivalent... ignoring aerodynamics Fitting somewhere between a GT3582R and a T04Z really shouldn't be too surprising, which is why it's magic that it's a 600kw @ wheels capable turbo Also worth noting that the 6466 a few pages back looks similar on Chequered Tuning's dyno: Be interesting to overlay that and the new Hypergear "ultimate" 500kw turbo
  16. Sure the engine is capable of that if the compressor and turbine can flow it and the fuel and setup don't become too knock limited, but an EFR8374 (particularly with his housing) will not allow that.
  17. Awesome! Just because I don't know any background on you etc, and I am a big fan of making sure people know what they are getting into and getting the best out of their setup for what they are hoping for - FP do fantastic turbos for the cost, flow and response... but the Super94 is a BIG turbo in effect, don't let the T3 flange etc and not being a large frame turbo trick you - it will float somewhere between a T04Z and T51R Kai in terms of lag, probably closer to the T04Z but still. On the flipside, it also is capable of making power up there with a T51R SPL - and given you are targetting in the region of 700whp on not huge boost using pump gas then you need a bunch of compressor, so hopefully you are prepared for the game to not really start getting exciting until around 5000rpm!
  18. I bet, is only going to be better on a 3litre - how far away is yours?
  19. I would love to see that dyno plot overlayed with a "-5s" car or something like that - it probably wouldn't compare too badly at all
  20. So fricken awesome that turbo technology is still moving forward like this. Should be a genuine 9s street car if the rest of the setup is up to it
  21. Not 100% sure, can try and find out need be - otherwise flick them a message on their Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/FPTurbos?ref=ts&fref=ts While on that topic, while it doesn't give specifics - here are a couple of interesting clips regarding the Super94 and 99 turbos:
  22. Makes a big difference in terms of what you choose. As a rough rule of thumb I guess I could say that you'd need to budget at least 20% more airflow potential for a pump gas turbo versus an E85 turbo hunting for the same power figures as a result of the ways they'd go about it - partly due to the boost limitation due to being much more likely to be knock limited with 98 RON fuel. If you are aiming for 500rwkw on 22psi using pump gas, you are going to need some REAL fancy parts - especially with stock displacement. The thing is going to need to rev, have awesome VE when doing so, be strong etc etc - the only people I know making that kind of power on pump gas are RB26 based with very large cams and turbos etc. Off the top of my head I'd be leaning for at least a Super94 HTA for that power on pump gas, if not a 4294HTA... haven't put a huge amount of thought into it right now but at least as an educated thumbsuck - you are probably needing a 90+lb/min turbo to achieve that, and one which with a high flowing exhaust side (and exhaust system) to ensure the exhaust manifold pressure is as low as it possibly can be, you're going to need huge cams and to be able to get as much clean air into and out of the cylinders with each gulp. If you REALLY want that much power, I'd seriously consider just planning to run on high octane and find the stuff supplied if it is not at the pump.... your engine is likely to last longer, be more usable and generally easier to make the power with.
  23. What fuel are you going to be using? Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2
  24. Wow, sucks to hear the old tune was THAT bad... Flags raised for me from things you mentioned though, so really glad you took it to JEM who yet again convince me that they are a class act, and glad it happened before damage wad done! Congratulations on a good result :-)
  25. That is crazy, still 2.6? Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2
×
×
  • Create New...