Timmaz300

Any updates on the g40-1000 or g40-1150?

I should have 9274 1.05ar results in the next few months. My 3 liter build is nearing completion.

Not sure what the temp rating is for the lines and fittings. I haven't finished the build yet and will be putting heat sheathing on each of the lines to keep them from melting. My manifold, gates, and turbo also have lava wrap and blankets on them to help reduce heat.

Is there any reason to upgrade the factory recirculation valve for a Turbosmart recirculated or 50/50 valve on my 9274?

This is a hypertune manifold for a rb26/30 in and r32 gtr. Turbo is a 9274 1.05 ar. Might work for you...

I'm currently having a rb26/30 built. I have an EFR 9274 1.05 ar right now, but I'm wondering if I should step up to the 1.45 housing? Its primarily a street car that i take to the circuit track occassionally. 10:1 comp ratio cp pistons Saenz tri beam rods Balanced and cryo treated stock crank Billet main caps and block brace CNC ported intake and exhaust ports Kelford 182-S cams 274/270 duration 10.5mm lift Hypertune turbo manifold Twin Tial 44mm wastegates Full 4 inch exhaust Plazmaman 76mm intercooler Haltech elite 2500 PRP trigger kit

Those results are awesome! Looking forward to see what the 9274 w/1.05 AR does on my RB30.

Just purchased a 9274 1.05. It'll be a few months before I have results, as I am just beginning a Nitto 2.8 build.

Thanks for the reply. From my reading, I'm under the impression that toe is more of a factor than camber, when it comes to tire wear. Also from reviewing Sydneykid's posts, seems like toe out is desired on the front for better turn in. If your want stability under braking a little toe in is needed, but some toe out will help the back end come around better. Not looking for a track spacific setup, but a reasonable compromise for carving up mountain roads and doing some non competition track time. Still need to figure out tire temps once I hit the track.

Hello everyone. I am wrapping up the last bit of my suspension build. I am looking for recommendations for alignment specs to start with. I have an appointment in the middle of march to get an alignment and corner balance done by a shop at the Nurburgring. I've been reading through some of the past threads and have a general idea of what I should do, but want to confirm that I am going the right direction with my setup. My current setup is: MCA Red series coilovers (11kg front, 7kg rear) Factory sway bars SPL castor rods, outer tie rods, front sway bar end links, rear upper control arms, traction rods, subframe bushings, and spherical knuckle bearings GK tech front upper control arms Superpro rear lower control arm bushings, rear sway bar end links bushings, front and rear sway bar mount bushings. Full Race ETS Pro Dunlop Dirreza ZIII (265/35R18) 200TW From what I can tell I should start with 355mm front 345mm rear ride height 6 degrees castor front -3.25 degrees camber front 2mm total toe out front -1.5 degrees camber rear 1mm total toe in rear Any input would be appreciated. Thank you in advance

At the moment I am not measuring back pressure in the manifold. The 9174 is supposed to spool a couple hundred rmp faster than the 9180, and has a higher rpm limit. I haven't fired it up yet. I got the .92 internally gated housing to keep it simple. I have the turbosmart dual port wastegate on it. I am hoping to keep spool to a minimum. If spool is good, but is not making power, I'll swap to a 1.05 and have external gates added to my manifold. If it doesn't spool like I want it to, I'll step down to an 8374. I figured I'd try a combo different from everyone else. I have a friend that just tuned his 8374 1.05 AR at 605 rwhp at 27 psi on pump gas. So I am hoping my 9174 will do at least that on pump.

I am interested as well in seeing some 9174 data. I have a 9174 with a .92 iwg on a stock bottom end. Full Race said it should be within 80-100 rpm more than a 8374, with the power of a 9180. I should be ready to start tuning it in early April. Still need a few more parts and some time to work on it.

Talking to the guys at Full Race, they said it wasn't a bad choice. I recall seeing a post from Geoff, mentioning swapping up to the 9174. 80-100 rpm later spool than a 8374, with a little more top end. I chose the .92 to keep things simple. I have a turbosmart dual port wastegate for it. I don't have E85 close by right now, but I will in a couple years when I move back to the states. On pump, I'm hoping near 600 awhp, and maybe 775 to 800 awhp on E85. I have ARP head studs and a Nitto headgasket. If the turbine housing ends up being a restriction, then I can get a larger one and swap to external gates. If I don't like the 9174, then I'll just swap down to the 8374. No harm in trying something different. Fuel system and ecu will be ordered soon. Just curious if anyone before me had numbers with this turbo.

Does anyone have results for the 9174 .92 yet? I have one going on my stock 2.6.