Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We have been down this track just so often it's getting BORING!!!!!

The PJR cars of Glenn Seton & George Fury plus others ran 17 x 9 front and 17 x 10 rear with 240/625 front and 240/650 rear slicks.

For the uninformed these designations mean 240mm wide (bag to bag) same as in normal tyre sizing x 625 & 650mm diameter, that's overall static diameter.

The OPTIMUM tyre size is 245/45 x 16. This gives the largest footprint and is still within 10% of the original tyre size of 195/60 x 15 and the TEST (recommended) rim size for 245/45 x 16 is 8 inches, so my call is the wheels to have are 16 x 8 all round if possible.

My road wheels are 16 x 8 rear and 16 x 7 front using 225/50 rear and 205/55 front.

My track wheels are custom modified BBS Lorinzer wheels of 16 x 8 all round with 245/45 x 16 tyres.

For the strip (drags) I have a pair of Mickey Thompson ET Drag Radials 265/50 x 16 and the recommended wheel for these is also 8 inches wide.

Looking at DrJosh's pics, I'm suggesting the tyres on his wheels are about 225 wide, due to the excessive stretch on the side walls. Stretch like this on a road car does nothing more than expose the side walls to infinite amounts of damage from an infinite range of sources.

Make up your own mind, but staying within 10% of original, which is mandatory in NSW, any 17", 18" or bigger rim will use a narrower tyre and similarly down to original 15's.

JMHO

These are my wheels collection:

The 5 star wheels are Monza Racing Rims and I use them for street use. The dark silver are the BBS Lorinzer wheels I use for track and the Silver Advans I just recently sourced to use as drag rims.

post-2962-1192931227_thumb.jpg

post-2962-1192931257_thumb.jpg

post-2962-1192931350_thumb.jpg

so 16x8 seems the go. What sort of offset??

i drove the HR around with 17" x 8" +22 on the rear and they were a good fit. i've just bought a set of 18" x 8.5" +20 and when they arrive i'll wack them on the HR and take some pics.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...