Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been rebuilding my R34 GTR following a crash during a track event some two years ago.

I've modified most of the engine, basically only leaving the bottom end standard.

For a complete spec list, please visit this link and scroll down below the pictures. All parts used are brand new.

For some time now we've been trying to start the car. We've run diagnostics on it and gotten some error codes, and we've managed to sort them all out except for code 21 (primary ignition signal).

I've searched the forums for other threads describing the same problem, and while the search turned up a lot of results for error code 21, none of the threads has dealt with problems such as mine (i.e. the car will not start at all).

We have spark on all cylinders, and we have fuel going into the engine. Ignition angle is 16 degrees. The starter turns over quickly and the car sounds like it wants to start, but the closest thing to a running engine we've achieved is a lot of back-firing in the exhaust.

I'm a real newbie when it comes to troubleshooting cars and fixing problems, but my guess is that one of the following are broken or not functioning properly:

- cam-angle sensor

- coilpacks

- AFM's

Any thoughts? I've posted this question on a number of other forums, but I don't seem to get any help. Having spent the last 2 years rebuilding the car, whereof the last 2 months just trying to get it started, I'm close to losing heart and taking a sledgehammer to the car in order to smash it just for the sheer satisfaction of the act. Help is desperatly needed!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221889-error-code-21-on-bnr34/
Share on other sites

I checked the link, nice setup man, looks smooth :blink:

If its complaining about the primary ignition signal, Id assume that to mean the CAS isn't behaving correctly. I'm not too familiar with RB26 CAS's, but id assume its a photodiode and chopper disk setup. 360 (=20) home slots and 6 trigger slots. If "Primary Ignition Signal" isnt refering to the whole CAS, maybe just one of those ouputs is broken, as i didnt think a RB would even fire without a CAS. I guess the obvious question is, have you tried a different CAS?

I'm just just thinking aloud here :(

GoodLuck

I checked the link, nice setup man, looks smooth :(

If its complaining about the primary ignition signal, Id assume that to mean the CAS isn't behaving correctly. I'm not too familiar with RB26 CAS's, but id assume its a photodiode and chopper disk setup. 360 (=20) home slots and 6 trigger slots. If "Primary Ignition Signal" isnt refering to the whole CAS, maybe just one of those ouputs is broken, as i didnt think a RB would even fire without a CAS. I guess the obvious question is, have you tried a different CAS?

I'm just just thinking aloud here :D

GoodLuck

Hi mate,

I don't have any clue whatsoever as to how the CAS is constructed, nor in which ways it could be broken to the point where the car will not start.

I've not had nor will have any chance of trying a different CAS. There's only about 12 BNR34's in Sweden altogether, and none of them are close to where I live. Being a delicate, rather expensive and crucial component of the engine there's no way I can borrow one either.

The same thing, of course, goes for the coilpacks.

Being a bit low on funds after spending some money on the rebuild of the car, I'd hate buying new stuff that's not really needed.

Many thanks for your reply, I really appreciate it.

Cheers!

Error codes in Nissan ECUs are persistent, ie they "hang around" for something like 50 start cycles. Try clearing (resetting) the ECU, see if you still have the error code.

If you have spark, then the CAS is working correctly. That also rules out the coil packs. And most engines will start without an AFM.

Do you have fuel "going into the engine" because you have fuel at the rail, or because you have seen the injectors working?

Are you sure the cams are set correctly? You had the crank at TDC when you assembled the cambelt?

Error codes in Nissan ECUs are persistent, ie they "hang around" for something like 50 start cycles. Try clearing (resetting) the ECU, see if you still have the error code.

If you have spark, then the CAS is working correctly. That also rules out the coil packs. And most engines will start without an AFM.

Do you have fuel "going into the engine" because you have fuel at the rail, or because you have seen the injectors working?

Are you sure the cams are set correctly? You had the crank at TDC when you assembled the cambelt?

Diagnostics tool and ECU has been reset/cleared between starts. We also removed the cable to the CAS, and then we would only get error code 11 (cam angle sensor). When CAS was reconnected, we once again only get error code 21.

Fuel is going into the cylinders, the spark plugs got very wet prior to lowering the fuel pressure. The injectors still open 8.0 ms when cranking the engine, some people guess the reason for that is choke (fuel enrichment for cold starts). Fuel is still going into the cylinders after lowering the fuel pressure. If I'm not mistaken, the car would not be back-firing if there's no fuel present?

Crank was at TDC and we double, triple and quadruple checked the position of the cams prior to assembing the cambelt.

The fact its spitting code 11 when the CAS isn't present, and a 21 when it is... I got my money on the CAS. Have you got access to a oscilloscope to check its output maybe? Could the loom be damaged between CAS and ECU?

Edited by GeeTR
The fact its spitting code 11 when the CAS isn't present, and a 21 when it is... I got my money on the CAS. Have you got access to a oscilloscope to check its output maybe? Could the loom be damaged between CAS and ECU?

Just like you said, the fact that a non-present CAS gives code 11 and a present one gives code 21 is what also made me suspect that it may be the CAS that's malfunctioning. Otherwise I think the first error code would still show up, right?

The wiring could be damaged I guess, but it's nothing that meets the eye at least.

I'll check access to an oscilloscope.

I'm very grateful for your input!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...