Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

and all this is due to the fact parents dont parent anymore (generalisation i know)....... they blame macca's for making there kid fat when the child doesnt have an income its the parents buying it, they blame the internet for there kid seeing sexay pr0nz yet they cbf sitting with there child or installing a good net nanny..... the list could go on and on, australia needs to harden the f**k up

and all this is due to the fact parents dont parent anymore (generalisation i know)....... they blame macca's for making there kid fat when the child doesnt have an income its the parents buying it, they blame the internet for there kid seeing sexay pr0nz yet they cbf sitting with there child or installing a good net nanny..... the list could go on and on, australia needs to harden the f**k up

Its not just parents sadly. Australia in general (dare I say the world?) seems to point the finger a lot without people standing up and accepting responsibility for their own actions/inactions. This isn't a new thing, its been happening for a long time. I would probably say it has something to do with the legal system (US and Aus and others) trying to push liability/culpability onto people who really have done nothing wrong. (Such as the bloke who tried to sue the council when he dove headfirst into a shallow river, became a quadriplegic and decided that it was their fault for 'allowing' swimming rather than him being a smart guy and actually checking the depth first)

People aren't big enough to accept their own stuff ups it seems. It's much easier for them to blame something. And of course, the government will react to the status quo, regardless of its merit. Thats why instead of having parents mind their childs internet activities as you stated, the govt feels that it is normal to let children loose upon cyberspace - and that's lead to the mandatory filter trial...

Wow... was that rant off topic or what? :D

-D

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep that's pretty much what I want to see. Racecars that look and sound like the Group A but with newer tech underneath to make them faster and safer. I'm sure there's enough VK-to-VN commodore, E30 BMWs and Foxbody mustangs shells around to make up a decent number of cars with hopefully a couple of sierras, rx7 and R31s in there too. 
    • Contact Jessestreeter.com/Skevas Racing/JustJap for a new r34 rb gearbox or go a cd00# conversion. No point playing with unknown condition gearboxes.
    • Such a shame places like Amaroo Park have been redeveloped, smaller tracks always make for good racing. Cheers for sharing @PranK there's some good Lakeside video's too. Its so hard with older the cars as parts are so rare and everything was made for a particular chassis at that point in time. Even the V8 Supercar Blueprint era cars are all different between each chassis within a team as they learnt things and made improvements. The COTF cars between each Chassis builder is different too especially motor/oil systems/intakes. The Group A stuff is worth so much too especially chassis with good history. The only way to do it would be composite panels and similar engine drivelines to the original cars. Ford sierra running Focus RS driveline, Commodore running a short stroke LS/LT or a Falcon with coyote and a H Pattern dog box. Could use a standard ecu across all models with a Torque Map and DBW for parity which is not even used in Supercars currently. Hell a TCM is almost a full chassis car these days and the suspension is not even close to standard style in the front running cars.  
    • Dashcams Australia (13/05/25) captured JDMHSE (Vic plate) being a right tosser. 
    • Wish someone would start a racing series for Group A replica cars, a bit like Touring Car Masters but for 1985 onwards and not grandpa's falcon and/or Monaro. I know they race in some historic class but that's for original cars, no replicas allowed.
×
×
  • Create New...