Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I took a stock R33 GTST for a test drive and the guy said it was "quicker" than a lot of them with 3" exhausts, how I took him to mean it was that it was more responsive and had more low down torque, therefore seeming "quicker" if you don't rev the crap out of it. Does the 3" reduce back pressure so much that it affects low down torque? Would a 2.5" be a more suitable choice for a near stocker? I can't seem to find any exhaust FAQs in the search forum, does anyone know where to find some good posts if this topic has been already covered?

At what point of modification does it make the 3" worthwhile (a certain kw, psi, or level of mod?) I want a daily driver that is still responsive down low.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33680-exhaust-back-pressure/
Share on other sites

The stock exhaust is 2.5".

A 3" or larger exhaust is usually the first step in any modification process. The mantra "get the air out before you get the air in" should be followed.

I drove my stock exhaust R33 GTST around for months. I then changed the dump pipe, front pipe and cat convertor to 3" high flow items. I noticed an increase in low down torque immediately but nothing really up high.

I drove that for months.

A week ago I completed the exhaust with a custom 3" system to a 3" inlet muffler with twin 2" outlets.

I noticed no real increase in low torque but a definate increase in top end.

In short. It's very worthwhile.

Plus the exhaust note makes the car such a pleasure to drive now and its also a lot smoother to drive when coming off throttle now. A very marked improvement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
×
×
  • Create New...