Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday all,

I live in semi-rural QLD, Ive had my rb20 cefiro dynoed twice, about 2 weeks apart, no difference to tune. Its running a remapped standard ecu and I wanted to check the AFR's.

The two dynos were different by 72 HP at the same boost, what the heck?

Im very confused as to how they can be so different.

Also the first dyno operator said my AFRs were unsafe and it was a "bad tune" so I decided to get a second opinion.

The second guy (lower reading dyno) however said AFR's were fine.

Who is right? Do I need a 3rd opinion?

RB20det

Mods:

Garrett GT2871R .48 trim/0.64 AR

GTR injectors

split dump into 3 inch exhaust

FMIC

Z32 AFM with pod filter

Remapped standard ecu for mods

Bosch 040 pump

[/url]

(1st Shop- tried 2 eproms, 1st was a little lean but headed for higher hp, 2nd tune got 246hp on14psi)

post-86037-0-33014100-1332678957_thumb.jpg

2nd shop- 174hp run was 14-15psi, 2nd run 188hp 17psi)

post-86037-0-77768500-1332678976_thumb.jpg

2nd Shop- AFR plotted at 17 psi

post-86037-0-89161300-1332678991_thumb.jpg

One last question, I have a power fc sitting around- is there likely to be any gain to me if I put it on and get it tuned?

I'd really like 300 rwhp,

thanks Jes

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/395901-rb20-dyno-conflict/
Share on other sites

power fc would be better. those afr's on the full runs are fine, that half run is a touch lean but not enough to be dangerous.

the difference in power could be something silly like slightly different conditions sending the ecu into knock maps. did it feel different to drive?

Hey dudes,

thanks for the replies.

There was no difference between how the car drove either days-it felt fine both times so Im doubtful that it became a bag of crap for the second dyno shop.

Conditions ie temp were not very different either day also so I dont think that could do it, Im fairly certain it is a remap as I agree with the fella above that a standard (unmodified)ecu

cannot and will not run gtr injectors or z32 AFM to even a vaguely acceptable state without some tuning?

Does anyone have any revelations about how these two dynamometers could be so different? If the first reading of 246hp is correct can I still hope to reach my goal of 300rwhp?

If the second dyno is correct, I find it hard (and heartbreaking) that my car could be as slow with all the good bits as a nearly stock R32.

If I cant find any other solution Im considering driving to Brisbane if it means I get a dyno reading I can trust-then if the car is not up to scratch I can just say "lets try the power fc then."

Further background info if it helps.

Initially before either dyno printouts shown here the car ran a different motor, it was a bitsa RB20 made of 3 dead motors and it produced 170 hp on the mainline dyno shop(which supplied the second printout),

after this result I went home and did a compression test which produce 138-145 psi each cylinder but No. 5 which was 26 psi down (118? I think). Based on those results I though

I was starting behind the eight ball and went out and bought another rb20 with low kms and 160-165 psi per cyl. The seller gave me one of his old dyno sheets showing 165kw (with exhaust and pod).

I installed this new motor with all my bolt ons and then began my tale of two dynos.

Jes

I must say, I find this fixation with the dyno numbers to be a bit vexing. Who cares what power-measuring-device-1 said and what power-measuring-device-2 said? How does the car feel to drive, and why do you have a target of 300rwhp anyway? Why is that number important? What would happen if you got that power reading from power-measuring-device-X and you weren't happy that the car was fast enough? What would happen if you got a 220rwhp reading from power-measuring-device-1and thought that the car was plenty fast?

gday GTS boy,

sorry to vex ya mate its ok. I dont have a mad love affair with numbers or anything.

The issue of 72hp difference on two dynos with same tune puzzles me, and a dyno is not accurate as a tuning tool whats the good of it?

Sorry to appear preoccupied with 300, Its a personal goal which I didnt think was unrealistic based on the testimonies of many others here and elsewhere.

I just want to go faster like everyone else.

Jes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...