Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Take your word for it Track goers ^

So the evo in front has full reign to do as they please (i.e own the track). His line appeared to change to rapidly on an acute angle.

It appeared to me at first glance the silver Evo has made a drastic turn in (lunge) to make the corner or block

(from the vid it looks as if had he carried on that line he would end up on the grass inside the track).

The vehicle behind was too close to the inside and would overshoot on the way out of the corner.

One under and one over - hence causing the intersect

Thats wrong. It is not a race meet. It is a club sprint. Contact is unforgivable and overtaking should only be on the straights or when indicated by the front car. Of course nobody meant that to happen but you have to accept your mistake and make sure as sh1t it never happens again.

Looking at a FB link and discussion, if these vids are all the same driver....The guy needs to seriously look at how aggressive he is. You can forgive one mishap bt he is a serial offender! If someone knows this guy sit him down and tell him its not his track and it is not a race. He is not a race car driver. Its a club sprint and each other car needs to be given loads of space. Even if he has a full PC licence it means nothing, these are not race meets

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwcNSg2PWTQ

I hope the OP reads this and accepts his attitude needs to change. Even if they are all different drivers they are all guilty of the same thing. Contact is not excusable and you need to give everyone enough room and only pass on the straights.

  • Like 2

I'm getting my cams license and want to start tracking for fun, and this sort of shit worries me, it makes me think my car is too slow and someone will get pissed off and come too close.

But EC and WP both have a no pass in corners rule I think

For the earlier comment about both drivers at fault:::

Sorry mate but i disagree, yes the drivers are responsible for the damage but the accident was caused by one of them not both.

If the overtaking car didnt drive like a tool and simply waited after the turn to overtake then the whole accident would have been avoided. He was in control of the situation with full visibility.

In terms of the silver evo, nothing could have been done to avoid the accident other than the assumption that he would have checked all 3 mirrors and a blind spot before taking his own race line and even if he did see the overtaking car and kept to the outside of the turn, there would have been every chance that the dooshbag hero would have still understeered into him anyways on the way out.

Edited by MrNsX

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwcNSg2PWTQ

I hope the OP reads this and accepts his attitude needs to change. Even if they are all different drivers they are all guilty of the same thing. Contact is not excusable and you need to give everyone enough room and only pass on the straights.

Oh wow. This guy has issues if he thinks he's in the right here too!

camera car at fault imo......he would have been out of the silver cars mirrors look at the line he was taking.

I wouldn't have waited to get back to the pits to kick his head in!!!! Sand traps are soft so It would be a lot easier to hide the body!!!

Neither was at fault, it happened on a race track, each driver is responsible for their own damage.

Like Pete said, it does deserve a punch up in the pits though. And whoever was running the day did not brief and monitor their drivers properly.

+This , the fact is, don't track it unless you can afford to lose/repair it, racing is dangerous and accidents can and do happen. However Duncan makes good point about the driving briefing but the dude may have chosen to ignore as he is driving like a douche for circuit sprints, so the option is this...

Do we know who he is? Because I want to make sure I never go out on track with him....

Would definitely be going Nascar style on him in the pits....

+This , the fact is, don't track it unless you can afford to lose/repair it, racing is dangerous and accidents can and do happen. However Duncan makes good point about the driving briefing but the dude may have chosen to ignore as he is driving like a douche for circuit sprints, so the option is this...

And given the other videos that are coming out... It seems like the dude is clearly has no idea how to behave on a circuit...

So highly likely that it was all clearly explained in Driver Briefing, only to fall on the deaf ears of this guy who simply, can't drive.

Off line and behind the other car, I think it's fairly clear who is in the wrong.

Not nice and the camera car driver needs to sort his attitude out, if you get blocked on a fast lap take your time pass the person on the next straight and then set up for a quick next lap.

And I am a complete liability which is why I always try to find my own space to go crazy on. Traffic management is a very hard thing to learn. I only ever started to think to understand how much of a science it was when I drove a car with no hp and good handling. You can drive close to your best lap times even with traffic if you learn to read their pace and be a little analytical with where you catch them. An ealy lift and brake early so not to crowd each other under brakes so you can get your usual corner speed and exit will likely lose you less then a second.

Its hard to do but fun learning how to do. Avoids accidents and a useful tool if you do want too race and need to be able to lap slower cars without losing time over the duration of the race

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
×
×
  • Create New...