Jump to content
SAU Community

R33 Gtst Track Build


Dale FZ1

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
On 9/24/2019 at 11:01 AM, iruvyouskyrine said:

Also can i request some pics of your engine bay (specifically the breather setup)

I'll do my best to give clear idea of the approach.  Might need a few more pics but the following few are from various stages of development.

There is a log of crankcase pressure, but with a max of 2kPa and engine revs in 6-7000 range and MAP 230kPa it doesn't show much.  Really just showed me that the setup I've run is able to push air out without big restriction against flow.

These few shots show the original LHS can that was configured with feeds from the RB26 cam covers with baffle kits.  Can has an internal baffle, and a drain/vent to/from the sump.  No one-way control of airflow.  Sheet metal in the sump provides a diverter to discourage oil trying to push up that hose.  All lines are big diameter, and the breather is via a 50mm filter. The scalloped out piece in the can is required to allow the big turbo drain hose to be routed without problems.

The yellow sump shows 2 x AN fittings, one plumbs to the LHS can, the other to the non-Neo head drain.  Big internal diameters to provide easy passage of air or oil, whatever was being passed up or down from head to sump.

Choice on the RHS was for a barbed fitting, as much for compactness in a tight area as anything else.  I'll get a pic or 2 of that up at some point, plus a reasonable description.

LHS, in operation showed that there was no oil pushing through the cam cover vents into the LHS catch can.  The hoses were more or less dry internally after running.  The conclusion was that majority of blow by gases in the crank case were not pushing up the rear of the block, but were able to take the path of least resistance via that "drain back" straight from the sump. 

How did I conclude that?  Ran a brand new white sock on the filter, and there was a very light discolouration from oil.  So air was passing out the filter, and minimal oil being entrained.

The answer to an obvious question - yes it is very tight to package.  Fiddly and relevant to track use only.

 

20190609_111101.jpg

20190117_070317.jpg

20190115_142916.jpg

20181027_171814.jpg

20181026_163721.jpg

20181019_113457.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The can plumbed to the RHS of sump is effectively only an expansion chamber.  This one was a rushed afterthought and needs more work.  No diversion baffle in the scraper plate sheet metal, and oil was not prevented from being pushed up the hose.  Once it's in the hose, a bit of airflow can make oil go up the 500mm and out a similar filter (but using a 40mm pipe).  Oil losses were probably in the order of 1-200mm, but it goes everywhere. The RHS can is mounted under my remote brake fluid reservoirs, general design is simple and probably about right.  No brake booster - earlier pics in this build show it's running floor mounted pedals with bias adjust.  Again, not relevant to road cars.

Pics will follow.  But this is one mod I think is very very useful in venting air from the crankcase, and allowing oil to flow back downstairs rather than be trapped upstairs and leading to pump cavitation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another one that is relevant (I think) to those people running Precision turbos.  I originally used commercially available oil drain fittings, and encountered smoke out the exhaust that people seem to comment on about PTE setups.

To their credit, PTE do a very direct/specific tutorial on their site, and on YouTube as to their turbos requirements on drains.  It mostly relates to the shape of their drain port, and I did not find any compatible setups that could meet their requirements.  So we made one, and used hose and fittings as large as we could physically fit.  Yes, there were routing problems, and yes, there were concerns about heat.

But this setup does work, and no smoke.  I do not like that we were put to the test to fix this issue (PTE should have a specific fitting made/supplied with their design to avoid dramas), but it tells me things about people who simply whine online rather than get a competent fabricator, and be prepared to work out the issues.  This is a good turbo IMO.  How it compares to competitors is open to discussion but I'm not complaining.  The oil feed filter is visible in pic.

20190422_102240.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pics showing design and positioning of the RHS can.  Simple construction, hollow/unbaffled internally.  Main body is 63mm tube with a 40mm neck to suit filter.  AN nipple on the bottom to take the hose fitting.

The most important aspect of this was to have a constant fall in the house routed from the can to sump level, nowhere for oil to pool and be blown out the filter by crankcase gases being vented.

As per previous comment, the two cans are effectively used to vent blow by gases direct from the sump.  Understanding the behaviour of oil within the sump while the engine is operating at speed/load, and with lateral/longitudinal acceleration loads is not easy, but we learned quickly that a diverter/guide near the sump fittings is necessary to deter oil climbing the crankcase wall and being pushed into the vent hose along with gases.  Once it's there, it will get pushed upwards and be spat out.

20190809_170033.jpg

20190809_165819.jpg

20190809_165737.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've been running a 525 for years with the standard hat and FPR in the stagea (mine has a 32 gtr fuel rail and stagea and 32 hat and tank setup are the same) without an issue with base fuel pressure. You said when you disconnected the return it is OK, did you do so at the fuel rail or the fuel hat? Either way I'd be looking for blockages or in the case of the tank kinks in the lines downstream Note I did however have an issue with the current required for the 460 melting the fuel hat.
    • I'm trying to maintain stock appearance . Hicas is still installed (although has lockout kit) did you retain factory fuel pump hat? If so I assume you used a bulkhead fitting or similar ?  I was also trying to avoid a full re design as it was previously dynoed at 426kw atw with same setup but different pump. Changing return line would also mean having to change ethanol sensor and fpr and possibly fuel rail. Not chasing more power in any way just reliability of the setup 
    • I do think it's weird I had it for 2 weeks then the issue came up out of nowhere and progressively got worse. I would've imagined changing everything in the ignition system would've resolved any ignition related misfires but still has the high rpm and idle misfires that seem unchanged. I would've thought if it was fuel related it would happen all the time unless it's the pump losing pressure when it gets hot. If it was the ecu I would think it would do it all of the time.  Something I noticed when I had it all apart was a pretty decent coating of oil in the J pipe coming from the throttle body. The weird thing about that is the pcv that goes to the intake is blocked off. So that has me wondering if the oil is coming from the turbo because that's the only thing that could get oil in there. This thing does sound like it spools like a mofo like I'm a former dsm guy and the only stock turbo I've ever heard spool this loud (to only go up to about 5psi) is on a diesel truck. And the recirculated bov is really loud too I had a TurboXS RFL and this thing is just as loud and being so low on psi seems a little weird. I don't know if any of this is or isn't related but just trying to make sure I'm not leaving any potentially helpful information out. 
    • So latest update. I replaced the ignitor with a jspec unit from enjuku. It felt a lot better at first although it is a little bit cooler of a day than it has been. Warming up didn't have as much misfire sputtering as before. Went on a 10m test drive. Felt good, a lot stronger though I was taking it easy on the boost. On the return trip started getting the cutting out at higher rpm again and was getting worse the longer I was driving. Took it easy the rest of the way home. Before turning the car off was getting the normal idle sputtering I was getting before.  So where I'm at now, entire ignition system has been replaced with upgraded components. Plugs still gapped at .8mm. Removed the fuel cap in case it was building too much reverse pressure I'm the tank, didn't help at all. Now I'm still on the same tank of gas the fuel treatment was in, I'm thinking if I can run that out and then refill with fresh 93 maybe  the treatment is too concentrated in some areas but doesn't explain that it only does it once the car is warm. I'm leaning towards fuel pump or injectors but if the injector was clogging I don't think it would make it shut off like it has but then fire right back up like nothing happened. So my current guess would be the pump. Without a fuel pressure guage no way to test or check it while it's running.  So that's kind of where I'm at. Need to start testing fuel components and ecu/wiring but I'm at a loss of what's the next logical step and procedure for testing it. 
    • @niZmO_Man thanks for that info, lucky I bought the gktech ones 🤙.
×
×
  • Create New...