Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks

Has anyone ever seen anything like this before with boost spiking?
Below is 4 small traces from 4 pulls.

spike.png.0c13d0017fb100827870bb7158db65be.png

Run 1 was done with a vacuum line running from the compressor housing to the wastegate.

Run 2, 3, and 4 were done running the line through the (Borg Warner) 3 port boost solenoid with it ENTIRELY UNPLUGGED ELECTRICALLY.

I can only surmise that the boost solenoid itself acts as a restriction. In run 4 I stayed on the gas longer and you can see it does drop to wastegate pressure.
Note: I've had issues similar to this with:

a) 4 port boost solenoid (MAC, very old, replaced)
b) 3 port boost solenoid (MAC, literally fell apart and returned)
c) Borg Warner EFR boost solenoid

If something else can cause this, what could it be? The gate was/is a 50MM Progate single.
I am assuming the wastegate is fine, as a hose directly from pressure source to wastegate works as expected. I have had (briefly) a MBC which also works as expected sitting in the line in the past. I have replaced all hoses and shortened them to no effect.

Is there anything else to check? I'd love to run between 10 and 20psi, but it really looks that if I hook up any boost solenoid I'm going to be dealing with at least a 20psi spike before settling down to whatever boost I specify (that part does in fact work).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473282-stupid-boost-spike/
Share on other sites

Too much power. Stock cars may run it but Skylines sure don't like living that long up there. 12psi is more than enough, 10 is okay but I'd love a little more than that, but really what I want is electronic control to actually hold the line flat instead of it falling off which is what you'd expect from a MBC or just a line to the gate directly. (12psi is 330rwkw)

Can't see how removing the plumb back would affect this? The plumb back is a 2inch piece of exhaust that is well over a meter long before it joins with the exhaust again, which would be unused when the gate is shut, I can't see how adding a solenoid in the line would affect it.

1000000000000000000000000000000000000%

It's pretty easy to see, blow air in one side, see where it comes out. Attach hoses inline with that flow, considering it's unplugged and all... did check to see if its leaking using the same scientific test and doesn't appear to be.

 

80465d1372138438-borg-warner-efr-boost-c

 

image.png.a7dd66500ab7206279b51dc5cd871e60.png

Here is a (blurry) picture of it plumbed in. The electrical connector was disconnected further up the chain. When I join the two hoses I've labelled together with a straight barbed connector, I get no more spikes.

The BW provided hose to the compressor looked a little kinked, so I replaced it with exactly zero effect.... on either configuration (plumbed into solenoid or past it straight into the gate).

3 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

image.png.a7dd66500ab7206279b51dc5cd871e60.png

Here is a (blurry) picture of it plumbed in. The electrical connector was disconnected further up the chain. When I join the two hoses I've labelled together with a straight barbed connector, I get no more spikes.

The BW provided hose to the compressor looked a little kinked, so I replaced it with exactly zero effect.... on either configuration (plumbed into solenoid or past it straight into the gate).

My set up: drilled and tapped nipple in compressor housing going to mac valve controlled by Link through to Synapse 50mm wastegate. Result pretty flat boost curve (attached). Can you swap out your wastegate to test it?

2013.11.21 Boost curve 001.jpg

Yep, this is running a (genuine) 50mm external gate.

I can get the thing to hold boost fine for 20psi, similar to KiwiRS4T posted just above, the problem is I may not want to run 20psi, I may want to run 15psi or 12psi in the fashion that was posted above, or 17 psi etc. Or say pull 5psi boost per gear in 1st, none of which really has much effect if I'm spiking to 20psi semi-controllably.

I just found it astounding that the spike happens when the device is plumbed in, even with the solenoid is unplugged. The logic that air has to do a 90deg vs not is the only real difference here but I just can't see that causing this oddity!

On 2/7/2018 at 11:45 AM, Kinkstaah said:

Hi Folks

Has anyone ever seen anything like this before with boost spiking?
Below is 4 small traces from 4 pulls.

spike.png.0c13d0017fb100827870bb7158db65be.png

Run 1 was done with a vacuum line running from the compressor housing to the wastegate.

Run 2, 3, and 4 were done running the line through the (Borg Warner) 3 port boost solenoid with it ENTIRELY UNPLUGGED ELECTRICALLY.

I can only surmise that the boost solenoid itself acts as a restriction. In run 4 I stayed on the gas longer and you can see it does drop to wastegate pressure.
Note: I've had issues similar to this with:

a) 4 port boost solenoid (MAC, very old, replaced)
b) 3 port boost solenoid (MAC, literally fell apart and returned)
c) Borg Warner EFR boost solenoid

If something else can cause this, what could it be? The gate was/is a 50MM Progate single.
I am assuming the wastegate is fine, as a hose directly from pressure source to wastegate works as expected. I have had (briefly) a MBC which also works as expected sitting in the line in the past. I have replaced all hoses and shortened them to no effect.

Is there anything else to check? I'd love to run between 10 and 20psi, but it really looks that if I hook up any boost solenoid I'm going to be dealing with at least a 20psi spike before settling down to whatever boost I specify (that part does in fact work).

It sounds like you have a leaking WG diaphragm or hose to the top of the gate. Suck on hose to the top of the gate and suck on it and ensure it holds vacum.

 

Jason

Update:

 

image.png.391fcdae27d135ded601008f682b23b9.png

Plumbing the lines like this fixed it. 

Seems that it really didn't like being in the simplest possible method.

Bit of playing with PID and start duty afterwards, now right as rain.

  • Like 2

Strange, I would have thought that plumbing one line directly to the bottom of the gate should be the most spike resistant/basic way to set up the gate especially if looking for low boost, like how most IWG's run.

It still makes no sense to me how this can happen by adding the solenoid in the middle of the vacuum hoses, when connecting the hose directly does not have this spike, with the solenoid unplugged, doing literally nothing.

Is it an example of the Dunning Kruger effect when you:

1) Try something, then get stuck
2) Ask for help
3) Take that help on board, get the problem sorted
4) Post up results so other people can find it?

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Kinkstaah said:

Strange, I would have thought that plumbing one line directly to the bottom of the gate should be the most spike resistant/basic way to set up the gate especially if looking for low boost, like how most IWG's run.

It still makes no sense to me how this can happen by adding the solenoid in the middle of the vaccum hoses, when connecting the hose directly does not have this spike, with the solenoid unplugged, doing literally nothing.

I'm assuming that setting it up in the pictures I posted above means that that line to bottom of the gate is always 'pressurized' and not going through anything (i.e the solenoid) and no more spiking.

Is it an example of the Dunning Kruger effect when you:

1) Try something, then get stuck
2) Ask for help
3) Take that help on board, get the problem sorted
4) Post up results so other people can find it?

 

The way you now have it plumbed is the normal way of plumbing a three port for most applications.

Edited by infomotive
Quoted wrong

A lot depends on the design of the wastegate.  The Synapse wastegate  has four ports - two above and two below the diaphragm and different combinations can get close to the desired boost levels leaving the Mac valve and ecu with just a trimming job. i saw a wastegate a while back with no springs and a solid piston instead of a diaphragm so it was all done with the balance of the air supplies (with a mac valve and ecu).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And make sure the belts are tightened appropriately too.
    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
×
×
  • Create New...