Jump to content
SAU Community

What happens when your turbo nuts fall off


Recommended Posts

Had a little fun on the weekend, thought it might be a learning moment for some others.

Recently there have been odd squeally noises when my car was on boost. Not all the time, usually while not fully hot under the bonnet. Intermittent nature of it made me wonder if it could be a gasket leak on the hot side (sounded like it was on the LHS of vehicle).

Sort of gradually became a little more frequent. So I chucked the inspection camera in under the turbo heat shield and found, to my mild horror, that the rear lower turbo nut had dropped off at some point. The lock tab for it was still bent up sufficiently that you'd think it impossible for it to happen. But happen it did.

What was somewhat more frightening was that peaking the camera on the other side showed that BOTH the other two nuts on the front side were loose. Several threads out. Both still in contact with their locking tabs. WTF! Only the top rear nut was tight.

So there you have it. Turbo was barely held on to the manifold and I could barely tell the difference in the car's performance. Sure, it was no doubt a creeping death onset and I didn't notice the slow decline in its spooling response, but it was still pretty much as fast as it ever was. After doing up the one nut that I could actually get a tool onto (so obviously, I have some more work to do!) it doesn't shriek any more and it seems to come on boost a little more aggressively. But there you go. It is surprising how little effect having the turbo almost to the point of falling off can have.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the rate of leakage from the flange was still less than what would have been wastegated, so the wastegate would have stayed closed for longer to compensate?

Or perhaps you just drive so slow already that the impact was negligible? :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See post from September last year in the EFR thread about my encounter with this issue...

 

It is worth noting that I did do a PB at QR with the issue also. turbo was to the point where you could move it a few mm at that point. drove home too with no issues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, GTofuS-T said:

I guess the rate of leakage from the flange was still less than what would have been wastegated, so the wastegate would have stayed closed for longer to compensate?

Yes, absolutely. At least when it is actively controlling boost. I think if the gap is wide enough to leak noticeably during spool, that it will kill spool (compared to having the WG held closed by the controller, like it is supposed to be). And after tightening it back up and having it feel a little better coming on boost, it was probably leaking enough.

42 minutes ago, GTofuS-T said:

Or perhaps you just drive so slow already that the impact was negligible?

Most of the time yes. I don't have anywhere near as much power as many on here have, but even that is enough to cost a great deal in tyres and -ve attention from the guys who drive the unmarked cop cars.

Edited by GTSBoy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've found those OEM locking tabs to be useless, even when hammered with an extension so it forms around the nut....so i don't bother with them anymore.

Only thing that has stayed in place for me was using inconel studs and copper locktab nuts....stayed on damn tight, so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. Any decent third party diagnostics unit should be able to talk Consult and all the other non-OBD protocols from back in the day. It's only 25 years since OBD started taking over. There's many cars from that ear still on the road. My mechanic's diag terminal is plenty able to talk to the other CUs in my car. Well, those that are still present, anyway. That's probably only the HICAS CU, as there never was an ABS or TCS or SRS CU, and the TCU went in the bin 25 years ago.
    • You'd be better off putting the ATTESA stuff into the boot. Same same but different, and not as bulky as a fuel cell. The space under the parcel shelf is not what I'd call "useful" boot space most of the time, even if I seem to have a guitar (not mine - child's) sitting there most days lately.
    • The main argument for lighter ARBs is that ARBs reduce the independence of the suspension. They link the left wheel to the right wheel. The lighter the ARB is, the less this linkage. When you hit a significant one wheel bump on a car with lighter springs and heavier ARBs, more of that disturbance gets transferred across to the other wheel. Whereas, with a heavier spring and lighter ARB, the impacted wheel is the only one that reacts to the hit. If you hit a significant two wheel bump, then lighter springs are the only things taking the bump as the ARB is not involved (both ends move up/down together). Then the spring rates alone determine how the car takes the hit. Softer springs (to a degree) will be more comfortable. Harder springs will accept the energy input better with less total compression (but obviously possibly more undesirable and probably uncomfortable body movement). The other significant thing to remember is that spring rate is really about coping with the rate at which loads are input to the suspension. Driving around slowly? Then any bump you hit is going to feed load into the suspension at a low rate, and you can use a low rate spring and with a low rate spring the damper has to less work to control the spring's motion. This describes street usage because it is mostly illegal to go fast or drive aggressively enough to require handling fast load inputs. But if you're going at racetrack speeds (or rally, or anything where going fast over whatever the surface is) then the loads get applied faster and you need to control that input with more spring rate, and then the dampers have to do more and that's why it all starts getting expensive. Anyway, the point of all that is, it's complicated, depends on usage and surface quality, and it's why proper race cars have a lot of adjustment and will even completely swap out springs and dampers when going from one track to another. One track might be smooth, and so even if it is a fast track there won't be rapid load input. Another track might be as rough as guts, or it might have a couple of sets of tight esses on it that require the car to heave from side to side. The rates at which loads get fed in will be different on those two tracks and probably require completely different setup. Three paragraphs and 400 words are nowhere near enough to convey how complicated this subject is and also I am nowhere near the right person to write a treatise on it, as it it not my field of expertise, or even keen interest. There are many books written on the topic, and as alluded to previously, they take differing approaches to accepting the compromises involved. So you can't read just one and think you understand.
    • Personally, i'd be dropping the extra $400 for the Pro series. I believe (at least during their original conception) they were based off the Blue series but have evolved with apparent new valving tech etc etc.  The BC's were super harsh ride wise, felt like the road was covered in potholes almost (this with damping at softest), but they did feel a bit more pointy initially through corners, i felt like there was considerably more understeer at turn in on tighter radius corners (but this is not really a like or like, considering the difference in wheel size, tyre choice, track temp etc etc) 
    • Facts but it's okay I've ordered a new ignitor based on GTSBoy's confidence. In the meantime I did the ole jiggle tap on the maf connector with no change. Seems like the warmer it gets outside the worse the issues get. Hoping it's the ignitor. Also going to pick up some carb cleaner and try to get that iacv cleaned out real good. I'll report back once I've gathered more data. I really appreciate the feedback though guys keep it coming. Trying to learn everything I can about this car want to keep this thing for a long time.
×
×
  • Create New...