Jump to content
SAU Community

Maxing out AFM on rb25 NEO - whats next?


Recommended Posts

I am running a stock Pink labeled NEO Maf with a STOCK Untuned NEO ECU... With the new larger turbo and intake system, i am now getting hard cuts when i am approaching 13 psi as the airflow is too much for the AFM.

I am planning on doing the norm and trying the already well documented Z32 MAF swap by ordering a ISR performance OE replacement from Enjuku Racing.

HOWEVER here is my question....
I have heard and asked some people if it can be done using the stock ecu (obviously i know that i have to repin the plug to the Neo harness) but some people are saying that you HAVE to have a tuneable Ecu/ Piggy back to make it work. even the product description on enjuku racing says you will ecu compatibility tuning to make it work. HOWEVER i heard some others say you can do it with no problem on the stock ecu but i never actually spoke to someone who claims they have with the stock ecu.

I am hoping i can get away with my stock ecu.

Does anyone have experience with the STOCK ECU?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I love Nistune, and also being a dealer/tuner for Nistune - the R34 one is a massive pain in the arse to get right.

The throttle enrichment, the simulated VE table and hitting the last row each time your boost sensor voltage taps out drives everyone nuts. Yeah you can "disable" the R34 MAP sensor, but then you'll notice the load scaling then goes out the window too.

Just go full standalone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Superpro are fine. There are some applications (R32 FUCAs for example) where they are no damn good, but typically for any normal suspension bush, they are fine. Some people will complain of them making noise. Some people will complain of them collapsing. But many of those can probably be traced back to not properly lubing at install or other installation problems, or possibly other problems elsewhere in the suspension that put additional load into particular bush. And for the legit complaints? Meh. Deal with it. I had to replace the poly bushes in my R32 FUCAs every year. The real issue is that I am sold on the idea of adjustability of at least upper arms. So I only have spots for poly bushes in lower arms these days, as everything else is either hardened rubber or spherical steel.
    • Suspension really is complicated.... All these considerations are making me over think it all. Again. I reckon I'll wait for SK's response on his coilovers, and go from there. Though if I go MCA, I'll have to decide on whether the extra $600 (voston comforts $1890, mca pro comfort is $2490) is worth it. Just something soft and comfy, yet firm enough when required at the track or a casual old pac drive for a pie... Otherwise, anyone have experience with SuperPro bushings? Needing to replace the bushings on the suspension department... Will probably keep the oem uppercontrol arms etc, and just replace the bushings. 
    • yes you are right, indeed it is for information only.  there is not much difference being at 9 or 9.5 or 10.  but when I see that you have to plane the block by 2mm if you have taken (example) CP piston which means that you end up with an 8.2 with the rb26 cylinder head.  hence the question I ask is what would be best to achieve what he is asking me.  take pistons in 9.0 or 10.0 to avoid planing a famous 2mm on the block knowing that I worked on the dome of the cylinder head which became total hemispherical
    • 600km?! That's amazing lol, was that turbo or non turbo? I'd be lucky to get 400km on a tank lol (though that's mods for you i guess lol)
×
×
  • Create New...