Jump to content
SAU Community
  • Welcome to SAU Community

    Welcome to SAU Community, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of SAU Community by signing in or creating an account.

    • Start new topics and reply to others
    • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
    • Get your own profile page, build reputation and make new friends
    • Send personal messages to other members.
    • See fewer ads!

    Consider joining our newsletter for the latest content updates

    Click here to register


What to look for when buying a Skyline Crossover?


My2c
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm new to this forum but been a long time visitor. I'm looking to buy my first JAP imorted car. Ive done some research about different models as below:

 Nissan Cima, Fuga, Cedric, Skyline V36 350/370GT Type P & Crossover J50.

I found the Crossover a good alternative to existing local cars such as RAV4 and RX 350.

I need to know what are the common issues with the Crossover J50 models?

So far I listed my findings below:

1- LCA bushes

2- Water pump

3- Rust

Should I go for the RWD or AWD version?

Any transmission issue? Any rattling issue?

 

Sorry for all the Qs.

Sam

Edited by My2c
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • My2c changed the title to What to look for when buying a Skyline Crossover?

Why would an old Skyline crossover be a better choice than the smartest possible choice in the segment (being a RAV4)?

Typical example. https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2017-toyota-rav4-gx-auto-awd/OAG-AD-19381813/?Cr=0&gts=OAG-AD-19381813&gtsSaleId=OAG-AD-19381813&gtsViewType=showcase&rankingType=showcase

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, My2c said:

1- LCA bushes

2- Water pump

3- Rust

add to that list

  • insurance
  • parts availability
  • most mechanics wont want to touch it when things go wrong
  • you probably cant read Japanese therefore media/nav system is not great to use.
  •  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

add to that list

  • insurance
  • parts availability
  • most mechanics wont want to touch it when things go wrong
  • you probably cant read Japanese therefore media/nav system is not great to use.

I can use google translate or google lens to translate the text. Insurance is very expensive though. 

Most mechanics hate imported cars :)

I think some parts are shared between 370Z & Crossover but not 100% sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, My2c said:

Price is also $10k cheaper that the one in your link.

3x as old, twice the mileage. Orphan. Not a turbo coupe. Therefore the RAV4 is better in every way. If you're cross shopping these things and RAV4s, you already recognise that there's no difference between a jacked up Camry and a jacked up (Skyline?), for driving around the suburbs and using the extra ride height to clear the barkchips when you need to get it onto the lawn to wash it.

The only saving grace would be the much larger engine. But my 2.5L RAV4 accelerates off the line well enough to get in front of the Mini Clubman in the next lane. How much more does it need?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I don't know whether you've made a decision yet or not. But left to me, I'll choose RAV4 over skyline everytime. Apart from the fact that RAV4 is a new product, skyline is an old product that it's almost out of vogue. It has some issues and require high maintenance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Did you end up buying the crossover ? 
we have had ours now 4 years and it’s got 292000km on it and apart from a new radiator it’s been faultless ! 
from the Infiniti quality to performance of the 3,7L smooth 7speed transmission. By far the best car we have bought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Latest Posts

    • looking good mate keep up the good work i like following this thread.  
    • 20220120_204714.mp4     Hey guys, passenger door jammed shut on me, I managed to get the door card off in one piece and have a look in there but can't seem to find the problem. Ive tried using combos of using the key and holding the interior lock open, using both door handles and the central lock button. Ive tried pushing and pulling the door latch and lock rods manually The lock mechanism seems to turn and push the lever when I turn the key and everything looks to be in place. Cant for the life of me find the problem. Any help would be appreciated. If there is a manual way to open the door I haven't found it. Im guessing something inside the latch mechanism has gone bad but how can you get it out with the door jammed shut? 
    • There are literally dozens of aftermarket throttlebodies in DCOE carby format. The RB26 ITBs are so very very close to the DCOE bolt pattern that it is difficult to believe that Nissan came that close and didn't actually just use the DCOE pattern. Then, you can look at just about any EFI motorbike from Suzuki, Yamaha, Honda, etc that used single throttles, in whatever size floats your boat. 45mm? 48mm? Larger? They're all out there. Just build manifold and plenum and linkages to suit. As for compression and cams - the larger the cam duration, the more compression you can run. Just sayin'. And as for cost for bottom end.....8500 rpm is well within the limits of the stock bottom end. Especially NA. It won't cost much to make it good for >9000. Just need some light pistons and some moderately strong rods and bolts. On the subject of VCT.....all RB25s have it (except for the very first ones in the R32). The vanilla 25s in the R33 era cars were all VCT. There's almost no difference in the VCT between vanilla and Neo engines. The difference between Neos and vanilla 25s is that the Neos have solid lifters, a different included angle in the valves with a shallow combustion chamber. And in the NAs.....not particularly good flowing ports. I would not write off the power potential of an L series vs an RB25DE though, neo or not. 2.8L & 3L (and larger) L series builds, even running Mikunis, have made really large power. There is nothing wrong with the single cam engines. The twin cams are not inherently a massive leap in power potential.
    • Might need to make phone calls for garage plans before further car plans
×
×
  • Create New...