Jump to content
SAU Community

Actual size and lag time of s15 injectors


Noakesy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi all 

I have conflicting info about the stock s15 jap spec manual injectors

I require the correct cc and lag times for my apexi

 

I have seen cc range from 440 444 448 and 480cc

And as fo lag times .5 .583 .78ms

As well as confusing the nismo 480 with 1.100ms

 

My new injectors are 850cc with a lag of .780 at 14volt 

 

Are the stock lag timea measured at 14v also

I did speak with john at fc hacko and recomened i spoke with paulr33 

 

 

Screenshot_20211119-111240_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20211119-121622_Email.jpg

Screenshot_20211119-115722_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, they're not 480, and it wouldn't matter if they were supposed to be 440, 444 or 448, as <1% difference is far smaller than the random tolerances anyway.

As to the dead times.....dunno. But the part numbers are well known and I have seen very good tables listing all Nissan injectors against part # and specs, which I', not going to google up now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks it more what the apexi wants. I have googled for a few hours with not much definitive as well as the apexi manual. So many people saying they are 480cc i dont belive it myself.

I will be going with the 448cc and .583ms

As a stab in the dark starting point

Im sure alot of people have been down this path. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2021 at 11:03 PM, Noakesy said:

Thanks it more what the apexi wants. I have googled for a few hours with not much definitive as well as the apexi manual. So many people saying they are 480cc i dont belive it myself.

I will be going with the 448cc and .583ms

As a stab in the dark starting point

Im sure alot of people have been down this path. 

I have recently sent my OEM RB26 injectors out for service as a part of preparation for California emissions. Also as a part of that because I really don't want to waste perfectly good o-rings 6 months down the road I asked them to test the dead time and all that fun stuff. The spec for the stock injectors at 3 bar was something like 480 cc/min, I got 500 cc/min on average. The OEM ECU reports 0.77 ms dead time, their testing reported closer 0.5 ms. I asked them multiple times whether that made any sense, especially whether 4 bar having roughly similar but slightly lower dead time was normal for old injectors. Their answer was yes. I haven't started engine map development yet so I can't say whether their report was truly accurate but something to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok, so we've had some (expensive) problems but nothing critical, thankfully. I get parts from FCP Euro in the states and in this instance I got 4 x genuine BMW cooling lines and 4 x OE quality oil lines (because they had no genuine stock). Well, turns out the OE quality didn't fit and the guys wasted a lot of time with them. Thankfully FCP has lifetime returns but the genuine BMW lines locally were $250 each! They also discovered my drivers side engine mount was totally dead and the replacement mount was $350. This sucks as I almost bought new mounts when I did my FCP order and I would have had both the engine mounts for less than this local one. So, I'm assuming at least another $1500 on top of the existing number. They did reassure me that the new (used) turbos looked good which was my main worry. Car will be ready for Monday pickup. 
    • Forgot to add, that excellent economy was on street tyres, normal street alignment, I recall they were Kumho KU31. Current motor, with the silly alignment and tyres would go nowhere near those numbers.
    • And also, as small as the effect may be, the larger exhaust side places a lower restriction on the exhaust flow, even when off boost. When my bigger turbo went on you could hear the difference in the exhaust note at cruise (almost everywhere actually) and fuel consumption went down a little bit.
    • I got better economy after fitting a bigger turbo (when purely highway driving, Sydney to Forster, got down to ~8.3L/100KM), as it takes more throttle and RPM to get on boost.
    • Oops. Sorry mate. It is both excellent to hear and also surprising though. The amount of work required to (effectively manually, not on a production line) build a core vs your low retail price point is why I presumed that you were buying cores. But let's also be clear about what is meant by "build". At your price point I can't see you making cores from billet on a mill, even if CNC, or doing all the machine work on a rough casting. Surely the lumps of metal are sourced more or less ready to go from an Asian supplier, right? Maybe the same with shafts. I mean, you could turn shafts up yourself, but it's pretty slow going for items that are all essentially bulk order producable. I was always perfectly willing to believe that you assemble your wheels to shafts, fit up bearings and do all the balancing. I actually expected that you would have been doing all that even if the core did arrive from a supplier with most of that pre-assembled. Nevertheless, please accept my apology.
×
×
  • Create New...