Incredible, the majority of you have taken a pin head view of what I was saying instead of a helicopter view.
I am a huge supporter of driver training, it is hugely effective, but in the right context.
It is interesting that a number of you including one who claims to be "educated", I read through your posts and you take delight in attacking me, then attack my views, very interesting.
All but one of you missed my main point that Humans are risk takers and we can't get rid of that that easily, even skid type training won't do it.
Some of the best drivers in the world die in car accidents, this is risk taking, but their choice.
Hell, even I compete in a race environment, have a look at mu signature below to work out what my hobby is.
Race tracks run "come and try" days, you can eneter a drift meet at a Race Circuit as a novice, you can enter club spring meetings without being a member of particular clubs, all these things are available to those want to going looking for them.
And having volunteered at a race track for quite a numbe of years, I still see experienced people doing silly things on the way out the gate after many hours on a race track.
If you class "20 hours of training" as extensive then you have a way to go, you get liitle attitudunal change after 40 hours, so 20 hours I don't think so.
My core belief is that you train drivers to NOT to get into an emergency situation to start with. Maybe I am missing the target with this thinking, even though it is a universally proved method of driver training.
In response to "a professional" I have met many "Doctors, Lawyers and Engineers" who acted exceptionally unprofessional. Professionalism my old son, is a state of mind, not a job description. I have met many "professional" garbage truck drivers, secretary's, security guards, nurses, driver trainers and even some "professional" OHS & SES people, must move in different circles to you, but I have never been the military so maybe that is what is excluding me I guess.