Jump to content
SAU Community

Jc052685

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    52

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Jc052685

  1. Jc052685
    Didnt say i made 900 on a gtr. Just that it was through a 3" exhaust.
  2. Jc052685
    Odd..... I have made over 900whp on a 3" exhaust. Even that much must cover our apparent over zealous dynos.
  3. Jc052685
    3" I believe.... And its Rickys car, just so there is no confusion. I did not build the motor so I do not know the specifics. most modern fuel systems run 58 or so psi. That is where we normally run things. Had this car at 43.5psi in order to help with pump gas drivability but we had to turn it up. The ID1000's are rated at about 1150cc/min at 58psi.
  4. Jc052685
    You talking about raising the fuel pressure? Its already at 58psi. Figure another 25psi when under full boost you are looking at 83psi rail pressure. Not sure on cr
  5. Jc052685
    The restriction being what? The inducer its self? Restriction would be anything befor or after the turbo that would hinder flow.
  6. Jc052685
    Interesting... I asked in the other thread but..... do you guys trust Mainline dyno numbers?
  7. Jc052685
    So what will 97% dudy cycle on ID1000s on e85 get you guys? Though it was actually E70
  8. Jc052685
    This was a year ago on 13psi and pump gas (and i guess it was 480whp)
  9. Jc052685
    Nismo intercooler hard pipes Car made 490whp on 13psi...... Mustered a 507whp pull at about 15psi but the 93 octane pump gas was the limiting factor.
  10. Jc052685
    Intercooler is factory. ID1000s are running 97% at 58PSI base pressure.
  11. Jc052685
    I am curious what everyone thinks this setup actually makes?
  12. Jc052685
    No more nismo inlets I am assuming Ricky? lol
  13. Jc052685
    your race weight? I was at 3260lb.
  14. Jc052685
    yep
  15. Jc052685
    I personally feel that if the customer wanted to truly max out the turbos by freeing up some restriction that still exists in the inlet & charge pipe sections that I could get another 25-35whp out of them. Car is still on the factory intercooler & intake plenum after all.
  16. Jc052685
    Simply a dual 2.5" Maf-less system I built for it. I am wishing now that I used 3" as I may have left a few hp on the table. I welded 2.5" v-bands to the turbo inlets as to minimize the inlet turbulence that a couplet could induce. Took care to make sure all inlet pipe fitment was perfect.
  17. Jc052685
    The turbo its self is unmodified.
  18. Jc052685
    And here is the link http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/463036-rb-2860-5-highest-hp/
  19. Jc052685
    As instructed ........ What is everyone's thoughts?
  20. Jc052685
    Good idea.... You guys trust Mainline dynos?
  21. Jc052685
    But it will physically spin faster than what they tested it to, correct? Wonder how the Z32 guys are making well north of 500whp these days on stock turbos?
  22. Jc052685
    Well I can tell you this. My 550whp RB25 powered S14 ran a 10.9 @ 129mph. This car puts my S14 to shame.... Currently prepping it for a drag strip outing.
  23. Jc052685
    Or....... if you follow the graph to the right. More flow. Whatever you are used to seeing people do with these motors obviously requires more pressure to overcome its flow restriction than this motor does.
  24. Jc052685
    Or raise the flow... Boost pressure is nothing more than a measurement of restriction to flow.
  25. Jc052685
    They are rated at 360 hp at the highest rpm that Garrett tests them at. Not the max that they will physically flow.
×
×
  • Create New...