Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm selling my laptop cause the screen is too small, it hurts my eyes. Its a nice little laptop with the whole package in it. Good for use in the car or out and about. $2700ono 0433 408 840

VAIO 13.3" POWER NOTEBOOK VGNS58GPB

Microprocessor: Intel® Centrino™ Mobile Technology, Intel® Pentium® M Processor 770 (2.13GHz)

Processor System Bus: 533MHz

Cache: 64 KB/ 2 MB (on CPU)

Main Memory: 512MB DDR2-SDRAM (2 SO-DIMM slots, one used)

Hard Drive: 80GB (C:20GB, D:60GB) Serial ATA, 5400RPM

Wireless LAN: IEEE802.11b/g

Bluetooth: Version 2.0 + EDR

DVD±RW DL: Reading Speed: DVD±R, DVD±RW, DVD+R DL (Double Layer): 4x / DVD-ROM: 8x / CD-RW: 12x / CD-R, CD-ROM: 24x

DVD±RW DL: Writing Speed: DVD+R, DVD-R: 4x / DVD+RW, DVD+R DL (Double Layer): 2.4x / DVD-RW: 2x / CD-RW: 10x / CD-R: 24x

Graphic Accelerator: NVIDIA® GeForce™ Go 6400 with TurboCache™ (PCI Express x16 connection)

Video Memory: 128MB*

Display: 13.3" Wide WXGA (1280x800) TFT colour display (Clear Bright LCD)

Interfaces: USB 2.0 x 2, 4-pin i.Link (IEEE1394) S400, PCMCIA Type I/II x 1(Cardbus Support), RJ45 Ethernet, RJ11 Modem, Headphone jack, Microphone Jack, Monitor HD15, Memory Stick/Duo Size Compatible Slot

Modem: V.90/V.92/K56flex compliant

Ethernet: 100 Base-TX/10 Base-T

Audio: Intel® High Definition Audio compatible, 3D Audio (Direct Sound 3D Support), Stereo Speakers

Keyboard/Input Device: 18mm Key pitch / 2mm key stroke, 82 keys, Intelligent Touch pad

Battery: Up to 3.5 hours of use with supplied lithium-ion battery (VGPBPS2)

Dimensions (WxHxD): 312.5 x 29.9 (minimum) - 35.4 (maximum) x 224.8mm

Weight: Approximately 1.95kg (including supplied battery)

Warranty: 12 months standard

VGNS58GPB_8.jpg

VGNS58GPB_5.jpg

VGNS58GPB_6.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/104339-sony-vaio-notebook/
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...