Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I shouldn't say this, but at an educated guess.

Gold thing goes to wastegate, the other two can be used as either manifold or opened.

Now that I think about it, that picture you uploaded earlier looks shockingly similar to a std soleniod. (Well on the i-R, anyway)

The solenoid is the same as the DSBC Spec S ( the single solenoid version) - surely the guys at Cypher or another performance will know what to hook to what? Ive asked Jordan if he can shed any light on the situation.

Sorry something that should be straight forward is becoming a drama... we will sort it soon :P

ta

Conrad

Poyz it IS the same as the DSBC Spec S solenoid if you have worked with one of them...

do you have the doco on setting one up (or know what hooks to what?)

The DSBC Spec R has that huge dual solenoid box with the in and out connectors labelled clearly.

Ta

Conrad

Downloaded the Japanese manual for the Spec S (got any Japanese mates?) and the piccy for solenoid installation shows the IN line being the bottom steel connection, and the OUT line being the bottom of two plastic connections closest to the body of the solenoid.

I am unsure what the top plastic connection does, but its not shown as either connected or blocked off.

Hope this helps - oh, and make sure you mount the solenoid within 1m of the wastegate (usually where the stock solenoid was is a good mounting point) to keep good response.

Ta

Conrad

Hi adam 32, why don't you just take a guess and connect it up. It isn't gunna harm anything, leave the hoses long enough for swapping and take it for a short drive. Watch the boost guage and swap it around until it works. Take less time than typing posts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...