Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there all you lucky skyline owners!

I am hopeing to be just like you in the next few months, as most people do I been reading and reading as much as possible about the skyline, Im 99% of the model I want (94 r33 GTSt) but Im a little confused about the finer details.

Ive read the big thread about r33 models and I understand the main differences between series 1 and 2 r33's (the years, slight body, motor and interior differences ect..) However Im still a little cloudy on what the differences are between say a standard r33 gtst and a r44 gtst type M or and r33 with an M spec bodykit? How many little variations are there?????? (oh and if type m and m spec are the same thing I apolagize in advance for stupidity ;))

So far the only thing (I think) I know about this area is that cars Ive seen with "m spec" body kits have a tirm skirts ect.. thats a little more chunky than standard r33's other wise cannt see any other differences.

So guys any elaboration on this type s and M and mspec stuff would be greately appreiciated!

Thanks a Mill!!!

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14405-general-newbie-question-on-r33s/
Share on other sites

well apparently the s spec is the non turbo and the m spec is the turbo

my car was non turbo meaning it was s spec, now it has a turbo engine and pretty much every other gtst feature in it so its an sm spec..get me? haha sorry its late im going to bed

but yeah im not to sure really but thats what i have been told to believe

type s = non turbo

type m = turbo

a lot of people will say "type-m bodykit" theres no such thing, they think that the r33's with the 'chunkier' front bar and sometimes side skirts means its a 'type-m' or 'm-spec' but the front bar and side skirts are just nissan options. basically if you find any gts25t, both 1994 both manual for example, one has side skirts and meatier front bar, one has no kit at all, they're going to basically be exactly the same car mechanically, it's just a few interior/exterior mods or options that were chosen when the car was ordered.

and theres no such thing as m-spec, its just what some people call type-m, so basically its the same thing when u read it:)

also you will find that some 94 models will have the series 2 spoiler (more common on the 95) as opposed to the round one from the series 1. personally i think these look better than the series 1 spoilers.

also, as perviously mentioned... yeah the type-m body kit that people try and sell to you saying its a special version and crap like that.. is crap... but that bodykit does make the car look nicer (another personal choice).

my 2 c.

Thanks Guys!

You did well............... told me exactely what I wanted to know, lol funny you should mention people trying to Bull**** you, a car yard up here listing 2 r33 skylines one "m spec" one not, both turboed ect... one just has the optional body kit, however the car yard claims that its special model and is charging a extra $1100, lmao

Thanks again guy yas were a great help!!!

Brent: uh-huh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...