Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi everyone...i was driving to work and had to go into an RBT located on old northern rd (i think)...infront of Oak Hill College...hills area

the cop asks me to show him my engineers certificate....which i dont have...so he makes me open my bonnet

things he said were illegal

1) Pod

2) Frontmount

3) Atmo Bov

4) Turboback exhaust

5) Bodykit...including front bar, rear bar, skirts and gtr wing..He said "If its made out of FIBREGLASS it's illegal"

6) Numberplate on the side of front bar

7) Bride bucket seat and rails

then he said

ur P-plates cant be seen through ur 35% tint because its too dark (which is legal) and must relocated them

he then comes back and says ur car isnt registered in the RTA database

he says im giving u a caution and take ur car to the RTA to fix it

Question

1) my car isnt showing up in the RTA database..can i get defected?

2) Becasue i got a caution...will the cops know i've already been told and defect me the next time or let me off?

3) What does caution mean? ie. first time offence?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149605-cautionwarningfirst-time-defect/
Share on other sites

stay the hell away from castle hill.. I've lost my licence and defected twice on that road infront of my school (oakhill college)... dude see if you know a dodgey mechanic to clear your defects and then stay out of high heat areas like castle hill, liverpool and the city..

yehh hills area is getting baddd

ive neva been pulled over in the city

hhmm...........

i got done on new years day :(

near st marys

the thing that realy sh!t me was wat the cop said.

drove past him, he done a u turn and followed me for 20m then pulled me over for rbt, since i was under the limit he started looking at the car,wheels, exhaust, kit, tint, steering wheel

then the usual

pop the bonnet...

these are his words exactly after checking every part of the car

"since i pulled you over im gonna have to do something, i cant just let you go"

got defected for pod and exhaust

wat a way to start the new year

dirty cocksuka !

Hi, Just a question... so the cops usually do RBT's around Oakhill...

Where else in the Castle hill area do they usually have RBT's?

Just to know which streets to stay clear from...

stay away from oakhill college and off showground road (at night)

theres a defect station near it...behind the council

when u get pulled over there the cops make u follow them to the defect station

also does anyone know the legalality regarding rims..coz i just got new rims be havent put them on

like...1" or 2" larger than stock or has to be the same rolling diameter?

how wide?..if it doesnt go out further than the gaurds

and the clearance level from the wheel arc and tyre..wat distance?

also does anyone know the legalality regarding rims..coz i just got new rims be havent put them on

like...1" or 2" larger than stock or has to be the same rolling diameter?

how wide?..if it doesnt go out further than the gaurds

and the clearance level from the wheel arc and tyre..wat distance?

OK, my understanding is this:

- the new wheel and tyre combination must NOT have a rolling diameter greater than 15mm, but obviously if you go from 16's to 20's then you're probably more likely to get problems;

- I think it's a TOTAL increase in track of 1" (or 26mm), so you can get wheels 1" wider on each side. If you've got the correct offset, it would mean that 0.5" would sit on each side of the centreline of each of the new wheels, so effectively that covers your TOTAL increase in track width. (I hope you can understand this - it makes sense in my head...)

- your wheels and tyres should NOT go out past the width of the gaurds, and the clearance between the wheel arch and wheels/tyres should be fine if you've chosen the correct width and offset to upgrade to. What you should worry more about is the height of the car off the ground AT ALL POINTS (chassis, crossmembers, suspension bits, exhaust, etc.). The minimum ground clearance is 100mm, any lower and you're looking at a defect.

ONCE AGAIN, DON'T TAKE THIS AS THE BIBLE, CHECK THE RTA WEBSITE AND READ IT FOR YOURSELF. Also, remember that some people (whether it's the RTA, the cops or whoever) may have a different interpretation of what the rules actually mean - it'll be your word against theirs if you have any problems...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...