Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok guys can some one help me with this.

i req new rims as the rims i have, the offset is now to big for the for the front brakes and i have to run a 20mm spacer (+40mm offset rim)

would a +34mm with a 5mm spacer work. the reason why i wont to go to a 5mm spacer as i know it does not throw out the balance like the 20mm and it will also bring the track width in.

if i am corect the perfict offset would be 25mm front and 30mm rear for my car.

i have r33 gtst front brakes (HR31 struts) and std rear brakes.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180430-offset-question/
Share on other sites

+40 rim with a 20mm spacer = effective offset of +20

+34 rim with a 5mm spacer = effective offset of +29

So the +34mm rim combination has 18mm less track than the +40mm rim combo. Offsets and rim size can be used to determine clearance to the strut and guard, but they can not be used to determine clearance to the caliper, spoke design comes into it for this. The only real way to find out for sure is to bolt it onto the car and see if it clears the caliper.

Also a 5mm slip on spacer is much more likely to throw out the balance than a 20mm bolt on or a 20mm hub centric slip on (like H&R)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180430-offset-question/#findComment-3281982
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...