Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just brought my self a R34 GT-V, (Imported, waiting for compliance)

I have found out some info on the GT-V, but nothing concrete, like a spec sheet or something,

Just want to know if anyone has one of these or knows the specifications on the GT-V.

The jist of it is the GT-V is a NA sitting on a GT-T chassie, same suspension, same brakes, hicas, viscous LSD. how accurate is this?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/
Share on other sites

Just brought my self a R34 GT-V, (Imported, waiting for compliance)

I have found out some info on the GT-V, but nothing concrete, like a spec sheet or something,

Just want to know if anyone has one of these or knows the specifications on the GT-V.

The jist of it is the GT-V is a NA sitting on a GT-T chassie, same suspension, same brakes, hicas, viscous LSD. how accurate is this?

The GT-V has the same brakes and suspension as the GTT. The suspension wont make much of a difference because most people swap that anyway, but the brakes are a good upgrade.

The interior is still the na setup obviously (no centre gauges)

I doubt it has the GTT gearbox, most likely just the stock na box

Edited by R34GTFOUR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/#findComment-3788532
Share on other sites

Auto box, not sure if there is a difference between na autos and turbos

With the suspension, does this mean I can upgrade the suspension using GT-T parts or even R34 GT-R suspension - something like http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...E:L:LCA:AU:1123

Edited by Grunta
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/#findComment-3788561
Share on other sites

Almost 100% just GTT

GTR's use diff lower mounting points at the rear and have diffrent sprint rates at the front because of the extra weight of the driveshaft/diff/props

Just do a search (top right hand just under the SAU banner, click search, then adavanced search.. type in what ever and scroll down and click on the "suspention" section so it only searches that) in the suspention section.. has been covered many-a-time

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/#findComment-3789249
Share on other sites

I have just bought a R34 GT-V as said above 100% GTT minus the turbo. Mine is a 4 door 5 speed in Black Pearl, still very much stock [have to save some money before I have a play with it]. check out the link below.

       http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Gt-Owners-t204323.html

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/#findComment-3790788
Share on other sites

The GT-V has the same brakes and suspension as the GTT. The suspension wont make much of a difference because most people swap that anyway, but the brakes are a good upgrade.

The interior is still the na setup obviously (no centre gauges)

I doubt it has the GTT gearbox, most likely just the stock na box

Correct, the GT-V does not have the GTT box It has a variant of the R32 RB20DET gearbox ( with some subtle differences like electronic speedo drive, different shaped gearstick etc ).

GTV.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/#findComment-3801396
Share on other sites

Everything I have seen has said the GT-V came out in 2000, which is in-correct as my GT-V I brought was built in March 1999, (checked the VIN on Nissan Fast)

So I wonder what if anything is different about mine than the ones built in 2000+

It probably wouldnt have any difference if it was built late in 99, but March is very early, I got Xenons, as I saw them when I went and had a look at my car before it gets sent off to get a compliance plate. (hopefully they leave the xenons in)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/#findComment-3806798
Share on other sites

From what I can gather the GT-V is a 2000 production model but was released in late '99. The post 2000 release models had the S2 updates e.g. 2 tone gear knob/steering wheel, white backed speedo/rpm gauges on the dash, the (slightly) ugly front bar and probably a few more things I'm not aware of. This confused me for a little while but you're right, GT-V was first released in 1999.

P.S. If the workshop do their job they won't leave the xenons in :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/#findComment-3807287
Share on other sites

P.S. If the workshop do their job they won't leave the xenons in :D

yep true, they took mine out the bastards...

i've got the headlights that say xenons, but no xenon bulbs haha

i never understood why they took them out?? plenty of cars have xenons now days, whats the deal?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/#findComment-3813052
Share on other sites

I found this site the other day, it cover series2 skyline's. But info and spec seem to be the same as series1. you will need a web page translater such Free Web Translator

http://history.nissan.co.jp/SKYLINE/R34/0008/index.html

Free Web Translator

http://www.worldlingo.com/en/websites/url_translator.html

cheers :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214496-r34-gt-v/#findComment-3815661
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...