Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , a while back I read an article from Autospeed (JE) that made me stop and think .

Google EBDI or ethanol boosted direct injection and there's a bit to read , this PDF one looks interesting .

http://www.ethanolboost.com/LFEE-2005-01.pdf

Just as a taste I believe some of the manufacturers are trying to find ways to close the gap on fuel consumption between Unleaded Petrol and Ethanol blends of which E85 is one .

The thing that was always going to be the stumbling block for ethanol blended fuel was the greater usage and how to make that cost neutral or even cheaper .

Well it seems that ways are being found by upping the static CR's and I'd say playing with dynamic (effective CR's) with sophisticated variable valve lift/duration valve trains .

I haven't had time to read much yet but I get the feeling that direct injection and evaporative cooling properties of Ethanol are helping with detonation supression and I'd imagine NOx emissions .

I think what the manufacturers are trying to achieve is more power from smaller than usual capacity engines run in a higher state of tune . The smaller capacity engines have the ability to get better consumption but they have to be able to make acceptable torque to haul the typical SUV barge around .

I think there's a shift towards lowering C02 output as well so the manufacturers are obviously concerned about political correctness , Kermit customers and the real danger of this #@^&*ng carbon credit scheme business .

All I care about is interest in ethanol fuels and the available blends ratio increasing .

I think the secret with fuel consumption is higher CR's but detonation and NOx have to be delt with .

Thoughts , cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Legend. I ended up finding the facebook account of the owner of the first car i sent but sadly he deactivated the account. I think you’re right in saying it’s some sort of well done custom job. Really appreciate your help anyways.
    • Totally equivalent. Stock often goes from the comp cover because that's where the actuator is also installed and the factory needs 2" of hose to make the connection - and it comes as a pre-assembled unit. They totally have a boost reference from somewhere between the turbo and the throttle(s). Oh, jeez. Just do it in M12 then. We don't actually care that much. I would expect any such AN converter fitting to rely on an o-ring or some other seal onto a flat surface under the flange of the hex**, because bolt threads are no intended to provide a pressure seal. unlike..... pipe threads. **which also requires a suitably flat and smooth surface on the turbo's boss to provide the seal.
    • I also used NP   That’s were it’s seems to be the best place to fit it? All schematic shows also that it’s should be referenced from the turbo housing. But idk, I do see high hp cars without any connection or anything to their turbos, so I really don’t know how they connect their things
    • I do have loctite 243 and 246 and a few more models. I could drill it now in place and make new threads for m12 and order an4 - m12 coupling and fit that to the turbo. Run a braided hose to the EBC which I could get a an4 to 1/8npt 
    • So M12 and sealant should be fine?    NPT ” because that’s what I had and what I could get atm. 
×
×
  • Create New...