Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday i just brought myself my first car a early 1994 Skyline r33 GTS-T yesterday offa singapoore guy who needed to sell cos he was going back home. It looks pretty stock but i got a few plans for it. like with the money saved on the purchase i want to get sum buddy club P1 17'' rims and a new front bar

The car itself has turbosmart boost controller, autometer side mounted boost air/fuel pressure gauges, a'pexi downpipe and exhaust 3.5''(i think), performance brake pads and machined down, lowered all round with king springs, carbon fibre dash paneling, new handbrake boot and gear leather, sony xplod headunit with 6'' splits, turbo timer, air filter, razo gearknob, alarm and immobiliser. 93,..kms

Thats all i can think of atm, but at the price it was at it wasnt gonna last for too long $14,500 with rwc. i will probably take those stickers of too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37247-just-bought-my-new-carwot-ya-reakon/
Share on other sites

nice car dude

i'm saving up for some buddy club p1 racing rims as well.!!!

but it will take me a while after coping a big speeding fine. But yeah drive safely!~!

hey is that a GTS? or is it an auto?

14,500 is a bargain!! cant be for a manual gts-t can it?

but yeah enjoy ur ride dude

im getting a full check over by a family friend who imports and tunes jap cars early next week. but the car is very clean as u can see from the pics. Yea id like to know how much aset of these r worth new, most second hand ones iver seen r like round $1500 mark.

im getting a full check over by a family friend who imports and tunes jap cars early next week. but the car is very clean as u can see from the pics. Yea id like to know how much aset of these r worth new, most second hand ones iver seen r like round $1500 mark.

http://www.unrealautosports.com/shopdispla...&cat=Buddy+Club

i think the White ones might go really well with your car.. i dunno about the mighty gold.

Congrats...on the car. Before you spend a cent, have a chat to Skylinegeoff, INASNT & the boys from ICE Performace. INASNT just got 280rwkw from his beast.

Personally, I prefer the sleeper / semi stock look. Helps, keep the cops of ya back, and means more moula$ on the go factor... where it counts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...