Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I'm interested in selling my R32 onwards and getting an R34 GT-T.

I'm just after some information on exactly what I should be looking for, any particular issues or faults with the R34, and generally just any information which I should know when I am hunting around to find one.

I am after a regular R34, with very minimal mods and preferably standard, around the 2000 year manufactured mark, would be great if it was a 2 door model with the semi-tiptronic shifter

Any information would be greatly appreciated guy!

Regards,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381568-how-much-for-a-good-r34/
Share on other sites

There aren't alot of 2000 r34s around there are more 98 and 99's around

If your after an auto should definatley be able to swing a good one for around $18000,

Don't be tempted to go too cheap I looked at 3 under $16000 and they were all shit

There aren't alot of 2000 r34s around there are more 98 and 99's around

If your after an auto should definatley be able to swing a good one for around $18000,

Don't be tempted to go too cheap I looked at 3 under $16000 and they were all shit

Thanks for the heads up mate.

Anything around the 1998,1999 or 2000 range would be great as I am just after something that hasn't been through many Km's (as I dont want to have to replace seats, belts, handbrakes and all manor of other shit that gets worn out)

I searched on Carsales, and there seems to be lots in the 12k - 14k region.

What should I be expecting to get for around 18K?

Thanks for the advice, I'm open to hearing what anyone has to say for input :P

If your looking at agt-t I wouldn't recommend paying 12k it's gonna have some problems

Don't be so believing of the kms alot are wound back I would be more inclined to go for something just over 100000kms that the owner has receipts for the 100000km service being done

If your looking at agt-t I wouldn't recommend paying 12k it's gonna have some problems

Don't be so believing of the kms alot are wound back I would be more inclined to go for something just over 100000kms that the owner has receipts for the 100000km service being done

Thanks again mate,

That's probably a good idea. I just want something that is genuine and not hiding some massive fault or accident.

Is there any real point into buying one from a dealership, or getting it imported?

From my understanding its cheaper to buy them from Japan, but getting it imported, converted to fit out spec and then repairs are a nightmare

would you know anything about that?

Regards

Never imported a car myself

Your gonna pay more for one from a dealership that has just been imported

If it were my money I'd look for one locally, I would only consider import if I was looking for a GTR

Others here might think differently

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...