Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bought a second hand twin plate clutch, Nismo Gmax (exedy). The material on the clutch plates are a bit worn so id like to give it a freshen up before putting it into my car. A new set of cluch plates and machine flywheel, intermediate plate and pressure plate would be cool. Just wanted to know if anybody has done this before and who they did it through. Adelaide Clutch Services is the only company i can think of at the moment. Comments anyone?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49362-twin-plate-clutch-rebuild/
Share on other sites

I had my OS twin plate recon'd by Adelaide clutch as well. Cost roughly $450 to get the two metal plates machined (were bent), something done to the bottom part where the flywheel was, and a new thrust bearing.

Workes ok for me :( Dont know of anyone else who could do the same job....i might be wrong though...:D

I definately need new clutch plates in mine, actually im not sure how much material there is supposed to be on them, they seem worn but. Thanks mate. Do you know if its possible to order new plates direct from Daiken/exedy, cant see why not.

  • 2 weeks later...

Yeah i was expecting that and more, turns out though that the plates arent as bad as i thought so i might just give the flywheel/intermediate plate/pressure plate a bit of a machine and slap it back together. A new thrust bearing and hopefully i will be allright.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...