Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item: Kicker ZR360 amp

Location: Brisbane

Item Condition: Good

Reason for Selling: Never used it after I bought it, don't need it now

Price and Payment Conditions: $275

Extra Info: Don't really need this amp, its just gathering dust, but it won't be sold for a rediculous price either

Contact Details: Reply here, or PM me, Prefer Brisbane pickup, its heavy and I have no box for it, buyer pays shipping otherwise

KICKER ZR360 stated spec's: 90wrms x 2 @ 4ohm...... 360wrms bridged 4ohm mono.

3-4yrs old, In my opinion, and to a lot of people in the know, these are the best amps kicker ever made, are very very very underrated, are huge and strong. The 80 amp fuse says it all. Actual tested specs on another ZR360 are shown below (I don't have an actual birth certificate cause the original owner did not have it). But for ease, the summary is:

4ohm - 141.3 watts RMS x 2 @ 14 volts

2ohms- 257.4 watts RMS x 2 @ 14 volts

Bridged channels - 1 x 574.2 watts RMS (2ohm) and 1 x 725.4 watts RMS (1ohm)

Yes, these amps can be driven down to 1ohm, good for hooking up 2 x 4ohm subs together (or any other configuration). The amp comes with a standard module docking port which plays all frequencies as far as I am aware. Use your headunits subwoofer RCA outputs to turn it into a sub amp, conversely use front or rear RCA's with your headunits frequency cutoffs for your other speakers. Gold plated terminals, 4 gauge power inputs, 8 gauge speaker outputs, etc...

Fixxxer

Edited by Fixxxer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...