Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Can anyone tell me how is the width of a rim is measured/determined.

Is it measured from the total width of the rim from both outer edges of the lip (inner and outer edges), or is it measured from inside the lip?

Reason I ask is, I have just had delivery of a replacement front Super Advan 17x8J +35. This is the exact same spec (well meant to be) as the one its replacing but when I look at the profile of the spokes, it doesn't appear to be the same. The spokes don't come out as far.

When I got the ruler out it appears to be almost a 9inch rim when measured from outer edges but has 17x8 stamped on the inside. Could it be a blunder on the manufactuers behalf?

I'm sure there wasn't 2 variations in spoke design for this wheel but I'm no expert on this.

Hope this makes sense and sorry for the naivety on my behalf.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125724-rim-width-question-for-the-gurus/
Share on other sites

the width is most likely the same...u probably got the wrong offset wheel. The offset of a wheel determines how curved in the spokes are for the same wheel. Another factor is the disk of the wheel, whether its low caliper or high disk clearance wheels also determine how the spokes are curved. Hope that makes sense. two identical width wheels of the same model may look different depending on the offsets.

the width is most likely the same...u probably got the wrong offset wheel. The offset of a wheel determines how curved in the spokes are for the same wheel. Another factor is the disk of the wheel, whether its low caliper or high disk clearance wheels also determine how the spokes are curved. Hope that makes sense. two identical width wheels of the same model may look different depending on the offsets.

Yeah I understand everything you're saying and this is I'm confused coz everything is identical.

The offset, rim width and size are all identical to the rim I'm replacing, its just the spokes dont come out as much as the ones I already have on the front of the car. Maybe there was 2 different face designs I dunno.

I got the rim from Yahoo actions Japan off a wheel dealer and everything he advertised matches what is on the rim so I now have frown written all my face...just cannot understand whats wrong.

if it is exactly the same model, width and offset, then more than likely its the disk thats different. Chk on the insides of the spoke or on the sticker...it should have O, A or B something like tht...A is for high caliper clearance, O is low....jap wheels are a mystery sometimes...

if it is exactly the same model, width and offset, then more than likely its the disk thats different. Chk on the insides of the spoke or on the sticker...it should have O, A or B something like tht...A is for high caliper clearance, O is low....jap wheels are a mystery sometimes...

Crikey its more complex by the minute. Heres some pics I just took with all the info.

1st pics says 96/12

2nd says 17x8J / 35 / L

3rd says SA3R 17-1

Other than these details I'm bamboozled.

post-11303-1152616609.jpg

post-11303-1152616714.jpg

post-11303-1152616807.jpg

is there a sticker somewhere? maybe a pic of both wheels...

Nah the only other sticker is a shiny square silver one and its all written in japanese. The old rim is still on my car so I think I'll have to get it off tomorrow nite.

thanks heaps anyway man

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
    • That's some really horrible design with the way it's cut/shaped! Is there much damage to the box that failed in? IE, new fork and you can go again, or is it a total rebuild again? Id be trying to build that piece from scratch, and getting some reliefs added in the corner to hopefully stop breakage, and then swapping boxes ASAP, and then doing the same to the currently good working box. I'm assuming hard shifts have not been friendly to it!
×
×
  • Create New...