Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys trying to get a silvertop motor going here and have a very annoying prob.

I got the motor off someone and it had no compression. So I get it home and rip the head off expecting to see scored bores the rings lands melted etc. Upon inspection and taking the bottom end apart it was completely fine.

So then I check the head out, turn both the inlet and exhaust over and all the valves etc are moving fine.

So I put it back together but when cranking it over it the starter motor does not strain what so ever like there is no compression.

So I thought the timing may have been out but its all good, cams on TDC and bottom end on TDC too.

But still just turns over way too easy, I am suspect on either the inlet or exhaust no completely sealing off which may cause it.

About to go out and get a comp tester, but I am 90% sure it will show nothing.

Any suggestion what could cause this?

I have no exhaust many on, but that shouldnt matter.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131873-rb20-issue-suggestions-welcome/
Share on other sites

Are the spark plugs in the motor? Also piston rings could look ok, but not seal the combustion chamber. The valves may move ok, but are the seats ok? And if you took the motor apart and re-assembled it with the same head gasket, any chances of making compression are greatly reduced.

Are the spark plugs in the motor? Also piston rings could look ok, but not seal the combustion chamber. The valves may move ok, but are the seats ok? And if you took the motor apart and re-assembled it with the same head gasket, any chances of making compression are greatly reduced.

Spark plugs in yeah, rings are ok as I took the head off and put it onto a known good bottom end.

Brand new head gasket too. I suspect on the seats for now, taking the head off now to check it out again.

Tested with a comp gauge and it registered 0 accross all 6. Its torqued down to spec too.

stupid question, but you said the starter felt like it wasn't using much effort to turn the engine over... i take it you're doing the compression test by kicking the engine over using the starter with the coilpacks off?

have you checked that the starter is actually engaging and turning the engine over? I.e. are the belts at the front of the engine turning when you kick it over?

like i said, sounds simple, something worth double-checking though...

yeah found out what it was, the valves were bent.

At first glance it appears to be fine but when looking under each valve from the side they are slightly bent.

I suspect it was over reved, going to need new valves.

Edited by James_03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...