Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's not a Nismo wing. It's an Altia wing and it's ugly as sin.

The unfortunate part is that when you remove it you will be left with I think 3 or 4 big holes in your rear guards. Very bad.

I have seen it with the sides removed but the boot part left and it looks ok. There are another 4 holes in the boot holding it on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134082-my-own-chop/#findComment-2507791
Share on other sites

post-29391-1158093337.jpg how it looks as we speak

post-29391-1158093355.jpg what i want to happen

what do u think?

i reckon it still might need just the boot spoiler?????

i definately agree that it needs the spoiler but not that huge one! maybe the standard gtt spoiler or better yet a gtr replica!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134082-my-own-chop/#findComment-2514272
Share on other sites

Heya,

I had the altia wing on my 34.. see before

post-950-1158760264.jpg

and after

post-950-1158760272.jpg

You'll end up with bullet holes on each side when you remove it, and probably some bent panels, so basically the two rear guards and boot will have to be resprayed. Possibly your rear lights too to match the freshly sprayed boo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134082-my-own-chop/#findComment-2514334
Share on other sites

It cost me $900 all up (fill the holes, straighten the panels, blend the guards, respray the boot and tail lights). The removal is easy, i did that at home, there's about 7 screws per side, and 4-6 screws for the spoiler on the boot.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134082-my-own-chop/#findComment-2514400
Share on other sites

Were you happy that u got rid of it.

i feel a little worried, i think it actually suits my car. when buying a 34 i refused to get one a that spoiler but once i seen my car low and with 19s it changed my opinion.

post-29391-1158762994.jpg

from the front its ok but the back it looks big.

post-29391-1158762915.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134082-my-own-chop/#findComment-2514421
Share on other sites

Hey Steve, yep i'm pretty happy with the result. The car looks alot cleaner without that big arse spoiler. Although, it does seem a little more bare without any spoiler whatsoever. What would be nice eventually, is to put a stock R34 GTR spoiler on (not the stock GTT), the GTR spoiler has a bit of meat and height on it without going overboard.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134082-my-own-chop/#findComment-2514638
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...