Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i have a few questions to ask regarding my nissan skyline r32 GTS4.. its the same as a GTS skyline except it has all the running gear of the GTR except the gear box and engine, so its 4wd..

in regards the the perfromance how much power is the stock rb20 engine capable of????

how much power can the GTS 4 gearbox withstand????

i have just purchased a 600 by 300 front mount by trust and i am hutning for a turbo which would be better suited for my car a 600hp T/3 T/4 trust or 370hp T28..

i was talking to someone who said i can get a piggy back type chip from a genuine nissan type dealer in melbourne for like 1000 bucks has anyone got one or heard of them???

what else am i going to need to make my car run efficently in regards i think i am going to need a fuel pump, injectors(wat size), possibly cams is there anything else..

any information would be helpfull as i am right in the process of gettin this stuff done the sooner i know the sooner i can go buy and enjoy my car lol

thanx guys also any other information regarding my car would be helpful in regards to parts and places i can get them from..

cheers jeremy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134628-performance-info-needed-for-my-r32/
Share on other sites

Stzrt by looking in the rb20 sticky section at the top of the page, anything up to about 250rwkw is about the limit of streetable power, although at this level expect it to be quite laggy. I believe the gearboxes are similar to gtr ones, so you wont have any problems there. Depending on what power output you are after, look at the rb20 guide, there is heaps of turbo selections avail, you just have to weigh up lag versus power. There are two guys on here who can do chips, no where near $1000, lot cheaper, or you could get a power fc for about $1600. You will need injectors, gtr ones are cheap and go straight in, a gtr fuel pump will do nicely, cams and gears aren't a bad idea, but ive seen 276rwkw without them. Use the search function it will save you a lot of time. The biggest problem you will have is that it is only a 2lt, and to make big power, you get big lag.

Stzrt by looking in the rb20 sticky section at the top of the page, anything up to about 250rwkw is about the limit of streetable power, although at this level expect it to be quite laggy. I believe the gearboxes are similar to gtr ones, so you wont have any problems there. Depending on what power output you are after, look at the rb20 guide, there is heaps of turbo selections avail, you just have to weigh up lag versus power. There are two guys on here who can do chips, no where near $1000, lot cheaper, or you could get a power fc for about $1600. You will need injectors, gtr ones are cheap and go straight in, a gtr fuel pump will do nicely, cams and gears aren't a bad idea, but ive seen 276rwkw without them. Use the search function it will save you a lot of time. The biggest problem you will have is that it is only a 2lt, and to make big power, you get big lag.

thanx mate i had a rough idea that 260kw was kinda the limits of the stock engine.. i have been contemplating putting in an engine transfer but the offer of a sponsor for my car parts came up so i didn't have to pay much to get more power..

much appreciated adriano

250-260kw out of a rb20 is going to be a lag MONSTER!

as for the ecu, just get a remap done of the stock ecu.

my recomendation though is to drop the rb20 out and put a turbo rb25 in. they are much easier to make power out of without being too lagy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
×
×
  • Create New...