Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been hearing that the 2540 can only produce as much power as the 2530, but with more lag... unless boosting really high. Most of these conclusions have been made from using twin setups on GTRs.

I would like to know how a 2540R would go on an SR20DET, since the 2540 wont fit without modification. The 2540R is also suppost to make a bit more power than the 2540... and the only difference i can see is that it has a 0.50 a/r compressor housing compared with the 0.60 a/r of the 2540.

What advantages/disadvantages would i see with the 2540R, compared with the 2530... i'd actually prefer the GT-RS, although they are very hard to find second hand.

Also... what about the 2835 with internal wastegate... would it be worth going to next step, or would it be advisable to go for the external gate model?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14246-hks-2530-vs-2540r/
Share on other sites

2540R is exactly the same as the 2540... the only difference is the 0.50 a/r compressor housing compared with the 0.60 a/r housing of the 2540. the other difference is the option of a 0.86 a/r turbine housing over the standard 0.64 a/r.

i would like to know how the smaller compressor housing a/r would effect things like response and power output.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14246-hks-2530-vs-2540r/#findComment-287064
Share on other sites

Hi RHiSC, The difficulty I personally have with the HKS turbos is that they are almost twice as expensive as the Garret they are based on. For example I recently set up an S14 SR20 on the circuit with a GT28BB and it definitely had all of its claimed 380 BHP. And it spooled up at 3,750 rpm and had good throttle response. The turbo cost $2,750 brand new from GCG, in comparison the HKS2540 would be $4,790 brand new. Simply put, in my opinion they are not worth the $2,040 extra.

My philosophy is that I like to run as low a boost as I can, as long as I can get the required airflow to make the horsepower target. The HKS modifications to the Garret design are aimed at making them more efficient at high boost, over 2 bar in some cases. This is the wrong way round for me, I would want them to do mods so that they produce more airflow at lower boost.

With a Garrett I can get a compressor flow map and work out exactly what you are finding very difficult to find for HKS, because they don't publish them.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14246-hks-2530-vs-2540r/#findComment-287216
Share on other sites

yeah thanks for that input... although i still think i would prefer a second hand HKS 2530 or 2540R for less than $1700

do you know of any places where i could find second hand Garret turbos, like the GT28BB? i thought this only was meant to produce around 320hp

i would also like an explanation to how the 2540R is meant to make more power than the 2540, when it has a smaller compressor a/r... would the smaller a/r of the 2540R have any effect on throttle response?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14246-hks-2530-vs-2540r/#findComment-287256
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...