Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My one is setup like the blitz, I bought a generic 230x550x75mm core, then ran the pipe back under and to the factory location. Total cost $400 and the pipe is within the confines of the under-body plastic liner. I can only get 1/8th of it warm on a hot day, so definately not undersized either.

<==== see avatar

Nice work 666DAN.. whereabouts did you go to get the piping done?

Nice work 666DAN.. whereabouts did you go to get the piping done?

Just went to a mates house and got him to weld all the sections up, bough them from an exhaust place and threw him some $$$ for the work.

It was a couple of 45's a 90 and a 180 from memory. The brackets holding it up are made of magnesium, awesomely tough and light-weight I was lucky to find them on e-bay. Some guy in Canada selling Magnesium solid bar.

  • 2 weeks later...

I've been going through exactly the same dilemma with my 34 so it's great to hear everyone's opinions :laugh:

This Trust FMIC kit for the R34 looks rather promising guys.

post-950-1167958487.jpg

http://www.uniqueautosports.com/pricelists...ylineturbos.htm

no word on pricing there though.

Has anyone seen any other photos of the R34 specific kit from Trust?

On that website it is described as a Trust item but I was sure that the end tanks are different to the one pictured :glare:

The V-spl is my pick at the moment... only for the fact that with a front facing plenum (which I am going to buy shortly), the cold side of the piping is only about 500mm long and a long way away from the exhaust, etc.

However, if I was going to retain the stock plenum, the ARC cooler is an awesome choice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...