Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys just got my '96 R33 today and I wanted to replace the low beams but can't afford a HID kit right now. What type bulbs do I need (I think H1) and also what are a good quality replacement that produce great white light. No MTEC my mate has them and I'm not a fan, Polarg...Philips...Thanks in advance!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157356-bulb-replacement/
Share on other sites

I was going to say mtec, but you don't like them?

mmm...how about piaa? Used to have piaa on my old car, the 7500k xenon gas filled (pretty expensive though, and they are not white, as 7500k is towards blue). You need something around 4300k to be white.

And yes they are H1.

Those bulbs are shit. They'll just blow in a few weeks.

White light is a trade off. They get the white light by placing a blue filter over the bulb which filters out yellow light. Considering that with halogen bulbs, the majority of the light is yellow, you lose a lot of light output. The whiter/bluer you go, the less light it is.

Bulb makers try and compensate by using 100 watt bulbs. They WILL damage your light switch, wirinng and melt the housing, and plug.

They also fill the bulb with xenon gas and overpower the filament. As a result, the bulb doesn't last as long.

With lighting, it's a trade off. If you want long life and good light output, get standard phillips bulbs. They'll last ages and have decent light output.

If you want more light, get the phillips/narva plus 50s. The narvas are about $25 for the pair. They put out about 50 % more light than standard bulbs. They run xenon gas inside and overpower the filament. AS a result, they're brighter, but don't last as long. They still last a decent amount of time becuase they're a quality bulb. They're a tiny bit whiter, because they're brighter, but they're still yellow in the scheme of things.

If you must go for white bulb, go for the phillips blue visions/narva artic blue. They're about $50 for the pair. They are the same as a plus 50 bulb, except they have a blue filter. So they put out 50% more light, which is cut back by the filter. So the light is white - almost a pure white. Theiy're still a bit brighter than stock.

PS: hid kits are not your friend. they're crap

SAU really needs a lighting section with FAQ. I'd be happy to write all the guides etc.

pm xizor about the mtecs. They last a few weeks then blow.

hell yeah.. mine just blew 2 days back.. and i got the MTEC for only like 1.5 mths.. waste of money..

mate if you say HID kits r not our friend..then what do you recommend for us to to have better vision at night? the halogens don't give off enough light... and the only way to go is HID conversion kits.. if it's not the way.. pls advise.. cuz I really wanna have better vision at night..

cheers

I've done numerous threads on this, because my dad and I are involved in research in this area. It is my dad's area of expertise.

I keep repeating (not your fault). SAU will have to make like a lighting section or faq about lighting, and hid kits etc, I'm happy to do it and mod it.

I've done numerous threads on this, because my dad and I are involved in research in this area. It is my dad's area of expertise.

I keep repeating (not your fault). SAU will have to make like a lighting section or faq about lighting, and hid kits etc, I'm happy to do it and mod it.

any mods can do this? would be good..cuz it sucks to drive at night =(

cheers

any mods can do this? would be good..cuz it sucks to drive at night =(

cheers

I also agree, more centralised information and professional (or experienced) recommendation is always a good idea.

People won't need to search and ask everywhere unless it is not covered by the faq.

Im using Phillips CrystalVison Plus H1.

Got them from ebay for pretty cheap ~$30 cheaper than rrp, as the dude had bought the wrong ones or something.

d00dz - Whats their performance like in wet weather at night? Can you see well?

Edited by Logikal
d00dz - Whats their performance like in wet weather at night? Can you see well?

To be honest I dont drive much in the rain at night.

But if I remmeber correctly, yes they are not bad.. Better than expensiver ones.

They last pretty long, I had some $25 one from Kmart and they blew in 2 weeks.

Just did a search on ebay and found some -> http://cars.search.ebay.com.au/philips_Ext...gZ1QQsofocusZbs

Included in the bulbs u also get a pair of white parker bulbs.

Though when I got mine I think they were $65, because the person was auctioning them and I managed to bid at the right time.

I was going to say mtec, but you don't like them?

I wouldn't piss on MTEC bulbs if they were on fire. And I'd probably laugh at the person whose headlights were going up in smoke.

ABSOLUTELY THE WORST LIGHTING I HAVE EVER SEEN.

Dim, blue, completely unsafe. You've got to be f**king joking me. They lasted one night in my R31, I threw them in the bin - even standard bulbs were better.

Get Narva Plus 50's if you want more light. They blow more often but them's the breaks.

  • 4 weeks later...

spot on the money kinks. Phillips, osram, hella and narva are the best bulbs money can buy. End of story. They always perform almost identically in bulb tests. They're all up the top.

The thing you have to remember is, other brands of bulb have different build quality. It's easy to go, fullyl sick, these t ricer bulbs are nice and white . But what you'll find, is these bulbs often fail bulb tests, because they dont' focus light properly. By buying well made bulbs, the light is focussed onto the road better, so you get more useable light, and of course, less glare to oncoming traffic.

Seriously, you wouldn't believe how bad those bulbs perform. It is noticeable, if you change a few different ones in, with your car parked up about 1 m away from the wall, some of them spray light everywhere more than others. You wouldn't think a bulb is a complex precision instrument. Well, it is. Imagine shining a laser pointer at a mirror and reflecting it towards the wall. Imagine moving the laser pointer 1 mm. Imagine how much the light will move over a distance of 10 m, at 50 m, the difference will be huge.

**Mind flash** As I've always said, this is the very reason why HID kits are crap. HID itself puts out 3 x as much light. so an oem hid designed headlight puts out lots more light. Yes, they are good. BUT the kits are loads of crap. They end up putting less useable light on the road, and lots more light upwards causing glare.

Anyways, back to the topic of halogen bulbs.

Keep in mind, that people have different uses of bulbs. That is, different things they want from them. Some want max light. Some want nice white/blue colour.

As we've established, those are the brands to buy. It is all a matter of what your needs are. the following are my suggestions:

standard bulbs: long life. Quite good light output.

plus 30: life is still quite long. 30% more light wiwthin the useable range (about 50-75m) plus slightly longer range. This is achieved through using xenon gas in the bulb, to allow the filament to be overpowered. Thus, having a more tightly wrapped filament increases efficiency.

Note: by overpowerd, I do not mean overwatt. They are still 55 watt bulbs. NEVER run a 100 watt bulb in your headlight. I've had to fix 2 headlights this year, because of people who have done that. It will melt your wiring plug, wiring and possibly your headlight. It can cause the reflective material to peel off the reflector, and make your lens go opaque.

By overpowered I mean more efficiently. Keep in mind, because of this, the life is a bit shorter. Keep in mind, you're supposed to replace bulbs every year. Efficiency does go down. A bulb that's a few years old might only be putting out 50% of the light it's supposed to.

plus 50: same concept as plus 30. 50% more useable light. Life is shorter again, but it's ok. You should still get the recommended year out of them.

blue vision: Firstly, a myth about blue/white light. Blue/white coated bulbs are not brighter. They use a blue filter over the bulb to cut out yellow light. yellow light forms the larger part of the spectrum for light produced by a halogen bulb. Thereofre, naturally, by puttting a filter on, light will be whiter, but it will be dimmer. It iwll look brighter, because brighter is whiter. imagine a 9 watt bulb at home v a 100 watt bulb.

Having said that, the good brands mentioned above use the plus 50 bulbs then put the filter on them. So they still put out more light than standard bulbs.

Keep in mind, the more you fitler it to make it bluer, the dimmer it is. the good branded white bulbs aren't overly filtered.

Many of those polarg/piaa/mtec etc use 100 watt bulbs, because they filter the light a lot to make it actually blue, not just white. They need the extra light to compensate. As a result, they do get very hot.

There is a good buy. If you want plus 50s, narva have bulbs as good as the rest, but for some reason, their plus 50s is about half the price. e.g. phillips vision plus is about $50. Narva plus 50 is only $25.

Hope that helps. I don't like repeating myself, but hopefully next time a bulb thread comes up, someone can link this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...