Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

had the water pump changed the other day (cam belt off) however now all my power has gone. itll spool up ok but over 4500rpm theres no power at all. i cant audibly hear pinging or misifirng. i just bought a new set of plugs and put them in today but the problem is still there

im guessing its timing, do my symptoms sound like base ignition timing (CAS) or is the cam timing out??

thanks

adam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16499-where-has-all-my-power-gone/
Share on other sites

Your ebc is farked, it is not bringing your car on boost... ditch it and try a bleed valve.

That was a joke, so stop your cursing.

If it was the base timing you could pick it from the positioning of the crank angle sensor in a second. Sounds like a cam timing issue if you have cam gears, but i just can't think of a reason for them to loosen the bolts to alter the cam timing. They may have jumped a tooth with the cam belt as well.

Take it back and get them to fix it.

yeh i have a feelin cam timing is retarded...

mainly cos the lack of power is up top

problem is this is the local, family garage which i used only cos i didnt have a rattle gun cos of the crank pulley bolt. so i think theyre gunah throw their hands up and say i duno... time to get angry :(

Has it been like that all the time since you've picked your car up...?

If it's base timing or cam timing, it could be diagnosed with visible inspection in very little time, check them both.

If all check up ok things get a bit more complicated. I don't have all the knowledge to advise you on, so i won't. Take it back to them to fix it, i'm guessing it'll just be the re-aligning of the cams.

the timing is easy to check with a gun.

Alternatively you can retard it in steps to see if you can eliminate the ping. If you have HKS cam gears they are dead easy to set back to the right level.

cam timing on the exhaust ought to be retarded about 3-4 degrees for best top end. (thats two little marks worth max on the pulley).

maybe i needed to be a bit clearer, sorry

i have std cam gears and cams. recently the water pump was changed and the cam belt removed in order to complete the job. since picking up the car from the garage i have absolutely no power up top and are getting some serious backfires.

is this a timing issue?

Remember the timing works on a double trigger. You timing light will read 30 degree for 15. I'm guessing the mechanic hasn't realised or You cam gears could also be a notch out. Pull off you front cover and check that all you TDC marks line up.(a little dot is punched in every pulley)

ok pullled the cam covers off this mornin and checked cam timing

its all 100%. if it were a tooth out im sure itd be running alot worse than what it is... so for now thats ruled out

its under full boost that its doing it, which makes me wonder whether its just a coincedence or that theres a boost leak or a problem with the turbo

it doesnt misfire, its just really hesistant under full boost over 4K. any ideas anyone?

a big thanks to those who have replied so far :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...