Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

im a little stuck as to what FMIC i should fit on my 32 gts-t

i have mate that can install the FMIC on so labour cost wont be

a big deal.

Should i look for a second hand or aftermarket R32 gtr FMIC

and fit that or should i go for a greddy trust V spec cooler supplied

and fitted for $800.

im only looking for anything around 200rwkw so im just wondering if

im cuttin corners goin for the gtr one and loosing performance compared

to the greddy V spec OR will the greddy cooler be a waste of money reason

being that its designed for alot more power than 200rwkw.

cheers guys...

Edited by RB32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165261-need-an-opinion/
Share on other sites

dont really want to start conflict but if its the 300 just jap ones ppl

have told me 2 stay away so now thats always in the back of my head

even though great results have come out from them.

with the 34 sidemount is that considered as an easy fit and also what would the price

be for the cooler and pipes.

in regards to the greddy vspec would that be just overkill for the power im after??

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165261-need-an-opinion/#findComment-3061359
Share on other sites

yeh i was talkin bout the just jap or crd ones, i havent heard anything bad other than bad installation techniques.

I use one of Just Jap's Cooling-Pro kits on my R32 GTS-T - Fitted up perfectly and has been great so far and its been on the car for 8 months.

RB32: As a rule of thumb, don't listen to everything you hear :nyaanyaa:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165261-need-an-opinion/#findComment-3061627
Share on other sites

there pricey at around 1200 A kit check out auto barn where abouts do you live>? narre warrens a good autobarn

hmm fair i might have a look.

im also waiting on my mate to see if he can hook me

up with any piping for the gtr fmic.

thanx anyway guys..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165261-need-an-opinion/#findComment-3066284
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...