Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have 0.63 GT35R (ext gated) and it is on boost by 3200rpm.... no idea on full boost yet as the wastegate was leaking before I took the car off the rd to replace the ecu with something better. Stock internals, but every piece of supporting bolt ons in place with the exception of my poncams..... forged internals on standby :worship:

R33 S1 - RB25DET

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have 0.63 GT35R (ext gated) and it is on boost by 3200rpm.... no idea on full boost yet as the wastegate was leaking before I took the car off the rd to replace the ecu with something better. Stock internals, but every piece of supporting bolt ons in place with the exception of my poncams..... forged internals on standby :D

R33 S1 - RB25DET

Do someone of you guys have a GT35R with 0.63 housing and can tell when the full boost will be available on an RB25?

As i read out the 0.82 housing have full bost at 4500rpm with some poncams on an RB25.

Thanks in advance.

Edited by Behind Horizon
I have had the .63 housing on my neo rb25det and it made over 340rwkw and rpm was at 9000 full boost by 3200 thats was at 1.7bar ..now thats pretty responsive for a high mount

it sounded like a machine!!!!...hahaha

cheers

Are you sure that your GT35R can deliver power up to 9000rpm with a 0.63 housing ? :laughing-smiley-014:

I have had the .63 housing on my neo rb25det and it made over 340rwkw and rpm was at 9000 full boost by 3200 thats was at 1.7bar ..now thats pretty responsive for a high mount

it sounded like a machine!!!!...hahaha

cheers

Can you please post up a dyno graph?

More importantly of where 'full boost' is made, is where it makes all its boost when rolling on the throttle in second gear and or how it develops boost in first gear.

A good example of this is the difference between the GT30 .8, GT35 .8 and GT35 1.06 on the dohc 3ltr.

The 'full boost' difference between them on the dyno is marginal but on the road there is a HUGE difference as to how they drive. The GT30 feels like a supercharger with strong linear power from idle where as the GT35 (in the lower gears I'm talking) feels a little laggy laggy then bang your off.

Interestingly they both made the same power on basically the same boost.

For comparisons sake the GT35r .6 turbine map flows very close but slightly better to that of the GT30r .8 combination.

The GT35 1.06 that I've seen makes all its boost around 3900rpm so marginally higher than the GT35 .82 yet on the road the difference in spool is unbelievable. Its as if the smaller housing starts making some boost and providing the windmill affect at a considerably lower rpm where as the 1.06 comes on in a rush within a few hundred rpm.

I'd really like to see the comparison in spool and drive ability between the GT3040r .82 and the GT35r .6. My guess is they would be 'fairly' close.

So in short; a dyno sheet making x psi at 4500rpm doesn't tell the whole story of how it performs on the road when taking off from a stand still then rolling on the throttle or accelerating out of that low speed second gear corner.

Are the GT3040r and GT30r different? I Always assumed one has a different front housing..

This thread is interesting as I will be putting my GT3040r on in the future and like to see back to back results with similar turbos.

Cheers

Yeah there's a few different variants of the GT30 with the 60mm turbine wheel.

GT3071

GT3076 (old school .7 comp 7blade compressor)

GT3076 (HKS3037S style .6 comp cover 6 blade compressor)

GT3040 (gt35r 82mm compwheel .7 comp cover)

so what would you recommend, gt35r .63, .86 or gt3040 .86, i'd really want a hks 3037 kit but they are too expensive, the car isn't used for drifting or anything, its just a daily street car and sometimes used at the drags which is why i thought the .86 gt35r would be a good option as it wouldn't run out of puff up top as i thought the .63 would, but if the .086 doesn't come on full boost until over 4500 it wouldn't be efficient as i can only rev to 7000 because its still a stock bottom end, say for example rolling in 2nd gear with a gt35r 0.86 at about 3000rpm, how long would it take to get up and go if i put my foot down, would it feel like a gutless NA car below 4500?

1.7bar = 25psi.

So whats the secret infected flow? How did you get it making 25psi at 3200rpm when every one else isn't able to get even a GT30 making that boost at 3200rpm.

So given 25psi at 3200rpm.. That would have to be 18psi by 2900rpm??? Sounds technically impossible from the 2.5ltr unless its ramp rate was mega slow ... as I said on the brake.

Not having a dig. Just trying to work out how you managed to beat the laws of physics. So tell us how you managed it. :)

I like lots of brutal quick spool and mid range that makes the driver work so I'm not the one to comment. :)

On pump fuel with std cams the .6 appears to make around 270rwkwish. Do cams you can pick up 30rwkw ish push more boost in to it and you should be able to crack 300rwkw.

Sure some are able to keep raming boost in on pump fuel which does make more power but its not good for longevity especially if you want it to hang together at the local track.

So in saying run out of puff up top.. Really no such thing it just doesn't make as much power as easy.

The .82 no doubts help with getting it to hook up and allows power to be made easier but to really make use of it a set of cams and extended rev limit would be nice. But realistically as long as it makes all its boost at 4k 3-3.5 thousand rpm band is ok.

The rb20t blokes work with less. :)

the 0.82 makes around 300rwkw on around 1 bar doesn't it, u saying the 0.63 would make 270rwkw with same boost, i got around 240rwkw now and getting kinda bored of it so i think i'll be going with the 0.86, dou you think it would be better low mounted or high mounted

Depends on the dyno and the car.

I haven't known one to make 300rwkw on 1bar BUT I was told I will get close with a set of reasonable cams (265's).

IF you run a nice exhaust manifold, nice inlet, free exhaust with big cams u can make 300rwkw on around that boost. But its not as simple as just dropping a .82 on and it will make that power on 1bar.

A good example is sky30. Std inlet, std exhaust manifold gt35 managed 312rwkw on 18psi roughly. tried cams didn't help with peak power due to what I suspect is the end of the run for the std exhaust manifold.

Did big cams in an rb26 head with its std short runner plenum and a nice exhaust manifold. Power jumped to 382rwkw on ~17-18psi.

Making the motor breathe better via nice cams, inlet and exhaust manifold modifications is a must if you want to run big numbers on low boost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...