Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SOLD

Item: R34 GTR Struts (springs and shocks, front and rear)

Age: Unknown

Condition: Excellent

Price: $350 starting price, really damn cheap

To Fit: (What car) R33 or R34 GTR's or R34 turbo models

Location: Melbourne

Contact: PM or email somecsstudent(at)gmail.com

Comments: Please PM me offers if you are interested.

Sold on ebay for $350 :P

post-5240-1162988525.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Bump, accepting offers :D

Email notification doesn't always work so PM is an easy way to contact me ;)

Dibs if they are still available. Just have to make sure its what we need.

Cheers

Price drop $550.

Does anyone know a compliance workshop that need some R34 struts ? :)

All offers will be considered.

Guys the truts are in very good nick if anyone wants them. I can recognise the picture taken in my garage. I sold him these a while ago, I don't know why he bought them or why he is selling them but I know they are in good nick.

Good luck with the sale mate .

Guys the truts are in very good nick if anyone wants them. I can recognise the picture taken in my garage. I sold him these a while ago, I don't know why he bought them or why he is selling them but I know they are in good nick.

Good luck with the sale mate .

Hey mate,

Yes, I borrowed your pictures because the camera was charging when I put the pics up and it still looks the same.

I bought the struts to get through compliance, after compliance I sandblasted the old springs, and put them back on the car.

So I now have some R34 GTR struts that need to go :)

Regards,

Gareth

Thats Blitz_R33, offer considered and not accepted, there is someone who had interest in the rear's only so if anyone wants to make an offer on the fronts only I can separate (only if I have buyers for both front/back) :banana:

  • 2 weeks later...
Not that I'm aware of, they are for the GTR.

Selling in 18hours at $450!!!!!

that's unfortunate =/ I need new shockies something bad...if they fit I'd get em. Good luck with the sale!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
    • Short inlet runners cost quite a bit. Dulls off the off-boost torque, and delays boost onset, because arrival of boost is driven by gas flow is a product of the ability to flow air which is torque. This is the reason that the stock manifolds have longer runners. On a 3L, or bigger, you can usually accept the compromise of giving away some torque because the extra capacity gives you a little extra to waste. But on a smaller motor, there's not a lot there to start with. Example, I swapped RB20 out of my R32, 25NeoDET in its place. The "wall of torque" that I experienced afterwards made it all worthwhile. That's because I came from RB20 land where torque is not a thing. But I would not do anything, anything at all, to reduce the low/mid torque I have now, because I remember what it is like to not have it!
    • Really, low/midrange torque goes really bad?? I want decent acceleration, maybe I use a stock rb25det neo manifold?    
×
×
  • Create New...