Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Morning all,

I just bought new Greddy adjustable cams and they look great. the only problem is they are behind an ugly black cover and now only i know they are there. I can only find clear cam covers on the net for RB26's. will that fit on an RB20??? If not does anyone know where and if they make them for RB20's

Cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/202609-clear-cam-covers/
Share on other sites

Morning all,

I just bought new Greddy adjustable cams and they look great. the only problem is they are behind an ugly black cover and now only i know they are there. I can only find clear cam covers on the net for RB26's. will that fit on an RB20??? If not does anyone know where and if they make them for RB20's

Cheers!

hey buddy,

i don't think there's much point getting the RB26 ones even if they do fit cos from memory they still say RB26 on them. unless u want people to think ur RB20 is a GTR motor.

If they do make them...i seriously wish i had of found them when i had my old r32. but no i haven't seen any buddy

Mate check with PSI parts,

They make RB 20/25 covers and have this thread in Business traders

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...ar-t155162.html

Cheers

Mushroom

i so wish i had of seen these when i had my skyline...i would've definitely got some

Mate check with PSI parts,

They make RB 20/25 covers and have this thread in Business traders

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...ar-t155162.html

Cheers

Mushroom

they do exist! Thanks mate your a legend! and i just bought one. cant wait. reading through this thread^^^ it took over 9 months for these guys to finally get to the final stage of producing this as it hasnt been done before. well done to them.

Can you leave the cover off? I'm sure I've seen skylines with out the cover, but I think they were RB26's, so it may not count.

Seen a lot of cars run with them off, but ideally it's better to keep it on. If something gets flicked up from the road, you can risk damaing your timing belt, and possibly causing it to snap if hit hard enough.

Seen a lot of cars run with them off, but ideally it's better to keep it on. If something gets flicked up from the road, you can risk damaing your timing belt, and possibly causing it to snap if hit hard enough.

Yeh, the ones I've seen are all high powered drag cars/dyno queens/ect. so thats not surprising

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...