Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh, one other thing about my turbo - the "bodgy" bit about the install wasn't the turbo itself, but rather the weak spring used to pull back the sticky wastegate pivot, as well as the welded-up and cut pivot. Once this is fixed I won't need the extra external spring and it won't look bodgy anymore :( It is a standard T04E turbo.

Actually Jay, you're the first person to ask :( This is probably because before today, I didn't even know what my turbo was. The engineer guy at Garrett instantly identified it as a T04E without even noting anything unusual about it, so I'd say it's the full standard unit and not a T3/4 hybrid. The previous owner advertised it as a "450hp T04" but I forgot to ask any more details about it before buying the car.

I've always liked this turbo, but there's nothing else I can compare it to really (aside from some poxy TX3 turbos I've driven from waaaay back). Benm's car with the factory turbo was slightly faster than mine when I got it, but he had a better intercooler and air filter. Since I upgraded my cooler and plenum I'd say they are at least on par again, and now I can also run higher boost due to the steel wheels.

My turbo seems to start spooling fairly low (maybe 2000rpm?) but it doesn't seem to hit maximum boost until 4500rpm or so. I always thought this was an anomoly of the turbo, but now I've found that the wastegate wasn't working properly it could just be that.

I'll re-evaluate it again once the wastegate is fixed. Maybe it is a lag monster relatively speaking, but it doesn't seem to bother me. I can still pull up a hill in 5th gear with a carful of passengers, so it must be doing something at lowish revs.

Hehe...cool. It doesn't seem like a lag monster if it's making boost around 2000rpm...that's actually very responsive. I used to have a GT3037S on a 2L and that was laggy, like no boost until around 3500rpm!! Too laggy for street use, but when it came on boost it was great ;) I think I'll try the GT2835PRO S for my next 2L.

Well that's the thing - it always felt like it was making boost early, but with my foot to the floor, it never got to full boost until around 4500rpm (maybe 5000). Going from what other people have posted here it should have been 500-1000rpm earlier than that to be considered an "early boost" type turbo.

I won't mind if it's around the same after it comes back, it was a gradual transition to max boost rather than a punch in the kidneys.

Fixing the wastegate should at least reduce the strain on my poor EBC, which has been fighting against this sticky pivot for well over a year now. If it brings full boost on earlier then that's a bonus.

Well you can definitely feel it kick in, a lot more than getting to the sweet spot on a lumpy cam on a NA engine (as I get on my bike). It's just not as harsh as some cars I've been in, which makes cornering a little more predictable.

I dunno, "feeling" of turbos kicking in is very subjective. One person might think the turbo kick is excessive, when another will think that the car doesn't even have a turbo. If we are ever at the same cruise I'll take you for a spin and you decide :D

Yeah, it is subjective I guess. I've heard that some RWD cars running large turbos tend to wheel spin when the turbo kicks in. Can get very dangerous in the wet, but if this happens, you know that it's a pretty big thump! :D

Never been in a car that does this, because my car is AWD and traction is rarely a problem. Though my sister has a stock s15 and it feels a lot more dangerous in the wet, even when my car had 206kW at all four wheels. It's really easy to get the rear end outwards when turning a corner (s15). And I can imagine it would be very difficult to control with 200+KW at the rear wheels. But I guess 10" width rims would give a little more traction...

I got the turbo back this morning and put it back in the car this afternoon, it was a lot easier than taking it off because I knew where everything went and where to get the spanners in.

Including getting everything like the exhaust sealing compound on it took me around an hour. The whole wastegate was replaced, apparently the old one was pretty stuffed. The new one operates very smoothly and with no freeplay at all.

I noticed that the spacer for the turbo mounting isn't normal because it causes the nuts to not go all the way down on the studs. I tried taking it out but then the turbo touches on the engine, so I put the spacer back in and did the nuts up a bit tighter than they were originally.

I haven't gone for a test drive yet because after all this I took the fuel pump out, but it all starts up and runs ok. I did a big coolant flush and put new coolant in and bled the system. The new fuel pump should be in tomorrow afternoon so I'll see how it goes after that.

Oh, the big thing - the rattling noise is now completely gone! Obviously the dud wastegate was the entire cause of the noise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...