Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

GeeTR, can double flare but to be honest its a pain in the arse, just did mine and trying to fit the flaring tool on the line while hanging under the car is a pain, not to mention the std lines have a coating so the flaring tool slips of far too easily. If I did it again I would rip the line out and replace it with ally line bent to replicate the original line (still plan to do this anyway).

greeces13, brads stagea runs a 1/2" feed line to the engine and a 3/8 return, feed splits into twin -6, return from rail to reg is -6 also. Im not a fan of the sard reg though, I would go aeromotive or magnafuel to your budget.

Endly noone reply me if a fpr with 6AN holes will be good for me...

And maybe I will go for two 044 or one 044 and one walbro external.

Well I'm unfortunately not someone, but my hot tip is this... that if your not hearing the the repeated (from multiple sources) answer you want, then chances are, ppl's results vary, which does occur, life isn't plugNplay.

If your tuner is careful (as he should be) a restriction in the return will show its head in a pretty linear and obvious fashion i would think (rail pressure rising over base+boost pressure)

Hence....

Considering in other of your threads, ppl mentioned that the stock lines would support 600rwhp, -8 return would be fine. In the total cost of things, playing around with returns is fairly trivial, and can modified later on, if proven to be insufficient. Swot i would do.

So give it a go, and let us know :)

Edited by GeeTR

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...