Jump to content
SAU Community

Fuel door and trunk release cable


Recommended Posts

I have an R34 one in my 32, but that is because the other end at the fuel door broke (plastic in 32, steel in 34).

Is the 2nd pic a temporary fix?

I think it is repairable, I'm not sure of the method but it would be worth either checking around or getting an instrument repairer to look at it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weikleenget said:

Yeah he tried a fix but it broke again. The cable is the exact same length and connection between 32 and 34, in other words no other modification is needed? The 34 cable is available for sale

The R34 cable is longer but it doesn't matter, because as long as the ends are in the right place there is just a bigger loop in the rest of the cable.

I see a worldwide shortage of 34 fuel door release cables starting very soon. Australia's stock already sold out 3 months back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Duncan said:

The R34 cable is longer but it doesn't matter, because as long as the ends are in the right place there is just a bigger loop in the rest of the cable.

I see a worldwide shortage of 34 fuel door release cables starting very soon. Australia's stock already sold out 3 months back

I'm confused honestly by this, as far as I can tell isn't this basically all repairable using off the shelf bicycle/motorcycle components? Other than the inevitable injection molded plastic bits. The T end piece is a very common bowden cable part that just requires the right crimper to replace, etc. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

I'm confused honestly by this, as far as I can tell isn't this basically all repairable using off the shelf bicycle/motorcycle components? Other than the inevitable injection molded plastic bits. The T end piece is a very common bowden cable part that just requires the right crimper to replace, etc. 

thanks Josh, that is exactly what I was trying to get at, I just wasn't aware of the term or method.

Please fix this one instead of reducing the parts remaining in a small pool!

Edit: sorry, to be clear, the fuel release end in the 32 is a plastic catch in a plastic thread which cracks....I could not see a practical way of fixing that beyond 3d design and printing which is outside my skill set

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...