Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Make/Model: Nissan Skyline Series 3 GXE sedan

Year: 1989

Kilometers: approx 360000, odo stopped six months ago on 350XXX

Transmission type: Auto

Engine: RB30e

Colour: Champagne on slate grey

Modifications: Lowered with king springs, pacemaker extractors fitted

Registered: Rego till 17/09/08

Accident History: Has damage to front l/h qtr from a carpark incident, few bumps typical of age

Asking Price: $800 ono

Location: Seaham NSW, 1/2 an hour north of newcastle

Contact Details: Email [email protected] or message me here

Other Comments:

Car is starting to show its age

Paint is faded on roof and boot

Diff is worn and makes noise, a bit clunky

Engine starts and runs fine

Auto trans runs fine

Interior is in very good condition for age/km's, slight wear on drivers seat

Front slotted brakes are a bit warped

New handbrake cables in rear

Needs new stereo

Has towbar fitted

Windscreen is cracked top center, needs replacing

Air con no longer works, hasn't for a few years

Temp gauge doesn't work, have speco 2" mech guage fitted

Car has some rust around front windscreen (not visible, but needs to be fixed to fit new windscreen), also some typical rust in front gutters (behind qtr panels)

Car has 15" bbs rims , 4 x 6.5" (original gts-r alloys, front + 2 spares, 2 x 7" on rear atm) will need new tyres on front soon.

Would suit someone looking for a project/track car or a cheap daily/parts, need to sell as I have a new daily ready to rego

100_0760.jpg

100_2020.jpg

100_2021.jpg

100_2022.jpg

100_2023.jpg

100_2024.jpg

100_2025.jpg

100_2026.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/226408-fs-nsw-1989-nissan-skyline-s3/
Share on other sites

hey would you put it on a truck and send it too wollongong???

very interested

That shouldn't be a problem if you organise. Payment for the car will be required upfront though. Also I'd prefer the buyer to have a look at the car so they know exactly what they are getting but thats your call.

Dave

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...