Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Unfortunately have to part with my beast. Here are the details:

-1991 Soarer TT

-Metallic Pearl paint

-84,000 kms

-18 inch deep dish Jap 3 piece wheels (275/35/18 on rear, 235/40/18 on front with room for more rubber! Rear treads brand new, front about 75%)

-Trust Power Extreme cat back exhaust (with two resonators- no drone but a lovely agressive note higher in the rev range)

-Biiiiigggg Strut Brace

-Choice of JIC Adjustable Height Coilovers with Solid Alloy Strut Tops or Standard dampers with King Springs. (JIC stuff is stiff and noisy but makes the car handle extremely well- up there with my old R33)

-Greddy Profec Boost Controller

-Greddy Turbo Timer

-Top of the line Clarion head unit with Dolby Prologic II and double flip out fascia

-Blitz Racing Boost guage

-Pimp tint on rear and rear quarter glass

-HKS Air Filter

-Project Mu Race Brake pads at 50% (This thing honestly stops better than my old R33!!! A little squealy but combined with the ABS makes an awesome braking system)

-Serviced with Mobil 1 oil, major service carried out one and a half months ago.

-Usual Soarer gear- fully electic driver seat (lumbar, under-thigh recline, rear seat tilt access) electric passenger seat, climate control air conditioning, tilt&reach steering wheel adjustment, holographic dash, trip computer, etc...

Optional: Hiro Motorsports front lip (came with the car, in pics the lip is just sitting on) Can also get my hands on some bodykits etc...

Very sorry to see it go. Every person who sees it loves it. Goes really hard (kept up with a GT28 equipped SR20 180sx) Stops even harder, handles unlike any other Soarer I have driven (with the JIC's), is a pimpmobile with a sting in the tail. Having a baby so I must get a four door car.

Looking for $20,000 o.n.o... Contact me at daver@inorbit.com or call me on 0419 529 586. Cheers guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24822-pimp-modified-soarer-fs/
Share on other sites

Hey! Cheers man!

*slips Phat $50 bill*

No really, it is a good ride peoples. Very quick, awesome looks and all the luxury you need. Quicker than a Monaro, handles better and I personally think it looks better. And it is wayyyy cheaper!!!

:)

stops better than your old r33 eh :P re he heeeeally... i dunno... :) but since i can vouch of the quality of your cars as i now own said r33 im sure this car wont dissapoint!

its just too bad im too tall for a soarer.. oh and i love the line too much :P

free bump!

Err, the pimp comes from everyone else lol. Like 'Man, that's pimp!!!' or 'Cool, your Soarer is so pimp!!!'...

Okay, okay, I am a wannabe pimp daddy. No, really, it looks a lot more impressive in the flesh. Very suave.

Arkad... yeah man the car does stop quicker than the 'line. I did not believe it was possible either. But stock pads vs Project Mu makes a huge difference. The rotors and calipers on the TT are not small....

But maybe it is just the G-force from the weight. I dunno. Seems to stop better to me...

:rolleyes:

  Quote
Originally posted by Squizz

Dave is no Pimp, I'm his Pimp, even had to give that bitch a bed for a few weeks.

*Sniff* it's true...

So maybe I am not a pimp... but the car sure is...

Someone buy it!!! Baby is one week away!! Open to offers.

  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...