Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has there ever been an sr20 powered gtr?

I'm a little confused as to why no japanese tuners have ever done this, as i think an rb26 is a disadvantage especially on a track like tsukuba.

Imagine the m-speed r34 gt-r with a stroked sr20.. it would be much lighter, and i'm sure it would produce more low down grunt then an rb26, especially seeing as tho the car would be much lighter.

hell you could even use an sr20ve head to make a broader, higher revving power-band.

and if that wasnt enough you could add a roots supercharger to help the turbo spool up faster..

hks and bee-r have made kits.

whats your thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256432-sr20-gt-r/
Share on other sites

Tuning garage "Signal" in Japan put a SR20DET in a R35(V35) for pure drift setup.

I was assuming the VQ35DE was a tad peaky when drifting and spun a lot more as opposed to the SR20DET which is most popular amounst drifter...

Just guessing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256432-sr20-gt-r/#findComment-4420270
Share on other sites

Problem with that is you'd have to mate the block to a front diff.

This would be an absolute nightmare!

I too toyed with the idea of an SR in a 32 but its simply not worth it. An SR in an S13 is fine, its a light engine in a light chassis.

Skylines need the enxtra torque from a 6 banger and cc's from 25's & 26's. They are a fair bit heavier. A GTR weighs what? 1400kg?

Yes there is more weight but you need the extra poke and torque from an RB. You would have to spend a little money on an SR to keep up with a RB26.

An SR in a stripped 32 is a different story.

Thats just my veiws on it..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256432-sr20-gt-r/#findComment-4420312
Share on other sites

you can achieve better weight distribution by putting a SR into a r32. the engine bay is designed for a inline 6 so the front axles sit further from the firewall (or the firewall sits further back from the front axles, whichever way you want to put it). so by using the sr20, you get the advantage of almost a mid engined car as most of the engine sits behind the front axle.

yes the gtr is a 1400kg car, but only because of the heavy 4wd system and the iron block inline 6. drop a alloy block sr20 and ditching the 4wd system, you could get the weight right down.

the sr20 has had a lot of development as well and big useable power can be obtained.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256432-sr20-gt-r/#findComment-4421823
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So the original radiator is leaking now. Looking at getting a fully aluminium one next. Am I correct in saying that the Series 2 Auto Stageas have a separate trans cooler from factory (located in between the rad and intercooler in my previous post/message).   Currently looking at Fenix $460, Blitz $700, GReddy $800, and KoyoRad $740. What are everyones thought on Fenix ( ive read a few comments saying theyre cheap Chinese rebrands etc and how their build quality is... well.. chinese...)  compared to the others? Worth the extra couple hundies?
    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
×
×
  • Create New...