Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item: A Framed photograph that i have taken - which shows plane trails landing at an airport at sunset.

More info:

Picture was taken in Nice, France.

Image is framed in a lovely black flat frame, with bright white border.

It really does look beautiful.

The sky esp with a slight purple tinge really shines. Looks stunning. Will go great on any walls in your house or if you want at your work place!!

Perhaps this could be a nice present for someone??

Price: $180 plus postage Check for other options below..

Print size: 610mm by 410mm:

Actual image (What it will looks like):

My sig is not printed on the photograph. Picture is just for illustration purposes.

Please do note image has been resized a lot and compression has been lost.

Im not going to post my highres photos as someone might just copy it and take it etc etc..

Oh if you look closely enough you can see the windows of the plane :P

IMG_3282_resizedupload.jpg

Framed photo image (how it looks):

Sorry will try and take better pics soon.. was in a hurry

post-12579-1237247737_thumb.jpg

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now if you want the different colored frames or borders etc.. i can do that :D

If you just want the poster i can print it alone too.. PM for price..

I can get the image framed in three different sizes with two different frame styles (box or flat).

Frames are crafted from quality timbers in a range of finishes. A white, off-white or black matte surrounds the print to emphasize my work and bring the piece to life. Premium ultra-clear perspex in front provides a superior finish and means the piece is lighter and easier for you to move without breaking.

Check pic below for different options: If you are interested in other sizes and what not, please do send me a pm.

post-12579-1237247813_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/261461-my-own-photograph-framed/
Share on other sites

You can now purchase all my other images online directly.

Please do visit my website (www.sidd-rishi.com)

Click on purchases and the rest is very simple!!

You can find out how the image will look like before purchasing too.. Eg) If you want it framed, it will show the final product.. so you know exactly what you are buying and how it looks etc etc..

Please do check it out :D

thank you

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...