Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Are you sure you're playing the right game? Resident evil 5 is like resident evil 4. it's nothing at all like 1 & 2, code veronica etc etc etc. You can't even run and gun in this. Oh yeah there are "zombies" (not even really zombies) coming towards me and i can't run at them with my machete i have to stand there like a dumb flamin mongrel and hack in mid air until they get to me....... FAIL :P

No puzzles either. Oh wait yes there is that dumb mirror 'puzzle' that took me about a whole 15 seconds to do. It wasn't even "scary." This game and capcom suck dick

i only played RE5 for like 5 minutes... as soon as i got to a scene where i had to fight zombies and realised you cant run or move at all while using a gun i turned it off and put COD5 back on.

I was a bit disappointed myself. I'm a huge Res fan and had them all on PS2. Since upgrading to the PS3 I bought Res5 and It's just a basic 3rd person shooter. Yeah Chris and Jill were back but where's the creepy old mansions at night with lightning and The moaning zombies you can't see cause of the fixed camera ? As has been said the puzzles were pathetic compared to old RE games. As a random 3rd Shooter 7/10 but for a resident evil game 3/10

....If only the PS3 was backwards compatible

I was a bit disappointed myself. I'm a huge Res fan and had them all on PS2. Since upgrading to the PS3 I bought Res5 and It's just a basic 3rd person shooter. Yeah Chris and Jill were back but where's the creepy old mansions at night with lightning and The moaning zombies you can't see cause of the fixed camera ? As has been said the puzzles were pathetic compared to old RE games. As a random 3rd Shooter 7/10 but for a resident evil game 3/10

....If only the PS3 was backwards compatible

it is, depends what version you have :)

  • 6 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...